That wasn't on the list. It just says the games would be released on the PS3, nothing about DLC. And Sony pays Ubisoft lots of money for exclusive DLC that never appears on other consoles, showing how crooked Sony and Ubisoft are.

I think this has more to do with him being in the Arrow TV show and DC wanting the villain to be in the comics in case anyone watching the TV show picks up the comics.

If I was buying one, I wouldn't care. I only play my consoles when they're online and connected to the internet now. I use it so stats can be tracked (time played, achievements earned while online to prove I'm not cheating).

Ok, guess it's not just Canada that's soft on criminals. 3 years in prison for killing someone by sawing their neck open?

If they had a publisher like EA or Activision, why would they even be on Greenlight since both companies would automatically get them in?

Hope they actually add collision detection in this one. Nothing like being hit thru solid objects by enemies, yet you can't do the same.

But then it would be filled with nothing but Nintendo games since all they do is re-hash the same old game for a new console.

It's because of the bleeding heart liberals who think everyone deserves a chance at life, no matter how many people someone KILLS. They think it's inhumane to execute another human being, no matter how terrible the crime was. When you take a life, by accident or on purpose, you lose all your rights and become a…

Sucks to be you. I look at achievements ahead of time, and only buy a game on the 360 if the achievements aren't a pain in the ass and have no multiplayer.

No, it's a good thing they didn't, because they make crap games like Bayonetta, which regardless of what you think, sold poorly and bombed. It's only getting a sequel because Nintendo is desperate for a mature title.

Funny how even with old PC games, FF7 still looks like the ugliest game there. PS1/N64 games aged so horribly.

Kinda like how Sony announced every PS4 game has a requirement to be downloaded to the Vita back when they announced the PS4, and it was only yesterday that people suddenly realized it because a developer "leaked" that information?

Herp derp. Spoken like a true Sony fanboy.

It's ok, it's Sony. The Sony fanboys will embrace the DRM and blocked used games, while they continue to rag on Microsoft, completely ignoring the fact that Xbox One doesn't charge fees for used games.

I'm loving how the Wii U gets sale prices, while the 3DS doesn't. I'm so sick of Nintendo giving the Wii U all the good deals while they rip off 3DS owners by charging $5 for Gameboy games.

Steam taught me used games are a stupid way to save money. I buy my games new when they're on sale, for cheaper than any used game price could ever hope to be. Yes, I do have some used games, but they were either out of print of under $10. I refuse to pay any more than $10 for a used game.

To everyone that supports used games:

This was announced when the PS4 was, and it's the nail in the PS4's coffin. As I keep saying, devs don't want to waste time with the silly little Vita, which has been a spectacular failure, so they just plain won't release games on the PS4. If they do, you get half-baked ports like the Wii/Wii U gets, or real big…

Some of us don't put ourselves into the hero's role because it's just a video game and we're there for the story, not to act out parts of the story.

What are you talking about? Microsoft hasn't "tripped up", did you completely miss the article about how used games will have NO FEES for the Xbox One? It allows used games, you buy the game at Gamestop or whatever, used, and you can play it when you get home without paying anything except what you paid at Gamestop.…