Save compassion for once the kids have gotten what they deserve. This article is a prime example of how bad kids are created.

Our figure-eight guru and testing director Kim Reynolds is a man of few words, but he had several after testing the Dart. His first were something to the extent of "This is just an awful car." Keep in mind this is only truly relevant to its at-the-limit handling. "It is completely uncomposed and sloppy. It doesn't do…

Cruze, Dart, Elantra, Focus, Forte, Jetta, and Sentra. The Dart I'm basing on Motor Trend's review and performance numbers, but I've suffered through the rest of them. People that can't appreciate the merits of the Corolla are people that shouldn't be in decision making positions.

I don't consider it a personal affront. One of my closest friends has diametrically opposed taste in pizzas to me. It doesn't make him a bad person. Buy what you like. Not everyone has to like it.

Talk to Aaron Robinson about what motivated him to lecture his readership on the unfairness of noticing that the Juke is uglier than hemorrhoid surgery.

I'm torn. On the one hand, your comment seems sort of mean and personal. On the other hand, I resent the hell out of every esthetically challenged clown that inflicts a Juke on the sighted public.

Hoon an Elantra and you'll get 18 mpg if not a tow truck ride.

Good reviews are bought, not earned.

Or I'm in a reasonably large quiet plurality. I've talked to plenty of people about the new Fords that think they're ridiculous. The similarity to the Juke is in the weak greenhouse withering to a small back window and hatch opening flanked by afterthought tail lights. The first Focus was a decent design, but the most…

I post on an F1 forum where most members are European. When this Focus was about to be released, I posted a photo of it as the new US market Focus and the Europeans went crazy over how hideous it was and how sorry they felt for Americans that Ford always sells us such garbage. They didn't know that they'd have the…

Awful to look at, worse to drive, frangible transmission, cramped to sit in, and sets ergonomics back half a century.

Those who voted CP are the real hobbyists that know this is a thousand dollar car all day long with its dead and undesirable twin-Zenith engine and automatic transmission. $3,500? Crack Pipe!

At least this explains what Audi's good engineers have been doing for the last dozen years. Why do you have to remove the front of an Audi to replace a serpentine belt? Because everyone that knows how to design a car that can be serviced quickly is assigned to the Le Mans team.

"The last time I suggested making one of my suggestions mandatory on cars many readers suggested I was a dirty communist plotting to force America's mothers to work on collective farms. So I'll stop short of saying this absolutely needs to be federally mandated. But I won't lie; I'm thinking it."

I actually know people that make car buying decisions based on infotainment technology, something that I personally don't like being a part of. None of them have ever mentioned Ford products in such a discussion however. They buy Audis today, express interest in CUE tomorrow. Aren't Ford buyers old enough that one…

I'm sure that provided a great comfort to the tractor-trailer.

I know a couple of SC430 owners, or at least former owners. They bought them because they previously owned the competition that is so admired by dreamers and wanted luxurious convertibles that worked every day. As for the engine, I don't remember anyone complaining about it in 2003.

The Civic is the lightest car in its class and the new one weighs less than the last one, something that rarely seems to occur in mass market cars these days.

No, they really do not.

Boohoo. You were exposed to reality. Sorry ostrich boy.