Don’t be silly, GTA is responsible for car theft.

Twitter was a mistake.

Someone smart replied to me a few weeks ago with a good explanation of how it’s different.

Just coming here to mention to you that the Sanderson books are *fantastic*. He does an excellent job of respecting Jordan’s writing style while (credibly and efficiently) resolving all the major plot points.

Have been saying this all along - I gave the show a fair chance and finished this first season. It just plain isn’t good. The show did a pretty poor job in building out a world and a main cast of characters well, it’s action sequences are dull, and there hasn’t been any hook that interesting to keep someone coming…

Wow. I actually drifted off a bit in this episode, so I was wondering if I missed much. Going by the majority of comments here, no. It really was the messy combination of soap opera, poor storytelling and execution, and occasional good moments that I remember.

For the first part, they removed all ethnic constraints on the show when they did the inclusive casting. There’s suddenly defining the ethnic identities of any group of people, so why would there be still a requirement for aielmen to be tall, pale and redheaded?

In democratizing the focus

But that problem is destination, not the concept of spending.

“BuT hOw WiLl We PaY fOr It?1!!11"

I have a younger 9-5 estate (2005 manual) so this caught my eye.

I’m throwing my vote in for a Nice Price.  The price seems fair and the car looks to be in great shape, not even taking into account all the miles.  Any auto part store should be able to get you any parts you may need to keep it running.  If it wasn’t across the country, it would be worth a look.  Speaking of which,…

This is disingenuous garbage.

If given the chance, present day me would tell young me to be kind to my joints, floss every day, and buy Apple stock when it $12.

If all they did was add a car to their coverage, there’s no way it would be automatically assigned a different level of coverage. It will be pretty easy to determine if the owner selected liability instead of comprehensive. “This call will be recorded” and all that.

I’ve seen how that typically plays out. The uninsured motorist in uninsured because they can’t afford premiums, and the only asset they possess is the POS car they just totaled.  It’s not worth the effort.

It’s about his way of dealing with a marriage and stresses. He’s the active participant in the story. While he (or anyone) might choose to not share the story publicly for the sake of their ex-wife and their kids, it’s a bit silly to say that the active participant in a story they’re recounting about themselves…

Actually in your example, it’s entirely likely that the owner of the stolen bat WOULD be sued and held as partially liable, especially if the bat wasn’t under lock and key or otherwise left in an accessible location. 

Hard disagree. I think this stuff is good to share publicly, to reduce stigma and help people realize they aren’t the only ones struggling with certain feelings and coping in unhealthy ways.

yeah, if the insurance company was the actual one to downgrade without consent could be a huge lawsuit in the favor of the insured. i wouldnt be surprised one single bit if the insurance company is allstate.