Y'all missed Minsc! Minsc and Boo!!

I think you have me confused with someone else. I'm calm, but thanks.

You're not the problem. The problem is the assumption that women are somehow "at fault" for the desire and/or need to stay home to take care of kids, particularly since our society makes just about zero provision for any men to do the same thing in a way that's socially acceptable. People leave jobs after a year…

Obviously men have it harder, we have to craft such integral hard hitting openers as, "Do you wanna see my dick? Do you give good head? What cup size are you?" and more!
All women have to do is say Yes! Ugh.

Right? I'm all, "Ooh, my shirt is too tight — I can feel it touching me!"

I routinely refer to pants as "leg prisons"

I don't even like wearing too tight pants. Man.

Ugh - can we not do this, at all, please? It's just a way for people to denigrate non-standard regional accents and dialects. I'll give you that there are some words we might pick up from reading & not realize the correct pronunciation for, but as soon as we start disparaging people who say "aks" instead of "ask," it…

Well, we can all agree thetans are real, right?

Censorship would be banning it. Criticizing it is just as protected as publishing it. And a lot of the strongest critics of the way women are portrayed in comics are avid comic book fans. So yes, we can talk about the way female superheroes are drawn.

I try to avoid the whole 'as a woman of color...' thing, but damn it, shit like this really bums me out sometimes, really fucking bums me out in a 'I want to curl up behind the couch and not move' kind of way, and I don't know how to deal with it. Most of the time you can ignore stuff like Vanity Fair and treat it as…

That's what makes this type of legislation complicated, I think. While I agree with you that GMOs present economic and ethical problems, rather than health problems, I don't think the average consumer thinks about those issues at all. Labeling GMOs is undoubtedly going to fuel scaremongering about GMOs being…

Look, if a company wants to sell "GMO Free" food, they're free to label their food that way, and there should be regulations to back it up. But labeling all of the food that contains GMOs, when there is NO evidence that GMOs are at all harmful? That's ridiculous and fear mongering.

If anything that's a patent reform issue, not an FDA/food regulation issue.

I've never understood the anti-GM crowd. It has always just seemed like a more modern version of the previous selective breeding we've done with all the crops and domestic animals we already eat. Until someone can come up with a convincing study as to why GM crops are harmful, I think that we should push the…

Provided that "Non-GMO!" Isn't made to be a selling point to the gullible public (much like "all natural")

BurningHen, it's not the ratio that you're lacking. You know how comic ladies are always drawn with tits and ass pointing the same way? It's a core strength, torsional exercise. You master that and you can whip those sweater puppies around at alarming speed.

Really, all of their anatomy is screwy, but yeah, the particular gesture of this pose showcases some particularly quirky thigh/hip issues. Also, the backpack strap in combination with the bodice make her right shoulder seem detached from her body. That right upper arm also seems too long, even for a 9 or 10 headed…