Counterpoint: bring a Roku Streaming Stick.

With cloth masks, it’s about the layers. You should have at least two layers of cloth. Three is better. Obviously different types of cloth will have different results as well. I’ve seen some people wearing these things and you can see their face through the one layer of material. I count them as not wearing anything…

The worst consequence is when the value is open, stuff also comes in.

Considering the vast unwashed masses repeatedly have their masks around their chins, under their noses, pulled down every few seconds “so they can breath”, and down to wipe at their sweaty mouth breather moist faces?

I wouldn’t call that necessarily a problem with the study, since the study was a demonstration of the method. It’s more a problem with how the media has covered the study. The authors do discuss the fleece, and they imply that it is the material, not the gaiter form:

ok!

FYI Shaving is necessary in certain OSHA regulated settings because the mask needs to form a seal on your face to prevent vapors from getting IN and killing you.

If it’s that simple you should have no problem citing a source and explaining your reasoning.

Did... you just call basic scientific discussion “weasel words”?

Question: What studies have you been reading that are ever 100% sure that they have found what they have found?

Because I will say that I’m CERTAIN that uncertain words are generally typical of most scientific and technical conversations.

For example:

If you…

Did... you just call basic scientific discussion “weasel words”?

Question: What studies have you been reading that are ever 100% sure that they have found what they have found?

Because I will say that I’m CERTAIN that uncertain words are generally typical of most scientific and technical conversations.

For example:

If you…

Now all the jerks who complained about having to wear a mask are going to wear these things

It’s worse because it gives the illusion of safety without any.

Yes, but this should be faster - if it works like AirDrop, it uses Bluetooth to create a connection to the other device, but then actually uses the much faster wifi connection to send the file.

The idea behind this (and behind AirDrop) is that it makes it easy to share something without relying on cloud storage, email, or even necessarily having the person you’re sharing with in your contacts. It’s proximity based, so it goes directly from device to device.

(I know - how exciting, proximity based sharing when…

If they have physical access to your phone, you have bigger problems.

If they have a screenshot they have the code and the username/email address. Both Google’s and Microsoft’s authenticators show the email address associated with the account that the code is being generated for, so you have 2 out of the 3 pieces you need.

As someone who recently blew up their phone (and then revived it), I would recommend moving to an authenticator that can be backed-up, like Authy. 99% of my 2FA was in Google Authenticator. I was able to move most of my codes to Lastpass Authenticator. I had to use my restore code to get my Steam Guard going again,…

Tested a couple of others on my phone:

Cool... so they have a screenshot of some random authenticator codes but no username or password or any way to control which codes they screenshot. Forgive me if I’m willing to wait for google to update the app in a few days with a fix.

What sites are you using? The only one I can think of that does that for me is Google, all the others (Amazon, LastPass, PayPal, Twitter, several others) require the code.