I came here hoping I would find pictures of said dinosaur coitus.

I like how computers went from wild form factors and colors to gray and beige boxes.

I wasn't specifically promoting Christianity, I was trying to clarify that scientology isn't a religion. The fact that you're not sure what to call clergy is a sure sign that you don't know enough about religion to criticize it yourself. Instead, you sound like you're parroting some pop-culture, "edgy" editorial on…

I used a computer algorithm to figure out how he should have looked.

Exactly. I probably don't have to cite it here, but it's worth repeating for the n-th time: [youfoundthecard.com]

The difference is that the Christian churches don't charge you money to give you an "audit" and the money you do give the church is at least going to some sort of cause. At the very least, Christian churches aren't conspiring to bankrupt you for their own gain.

Fair enough. I had one of those clear telephones as a kid and I would have people call me so I could watch it light up and watch the hammer ringing the bell in the phone.

I was just tired and grumpy. I prefer to live in the past and the past for me means "35mm or bigger!" To be honest, though, when you see all the photogs by the sidelines at the football games, you don't see many Sonys.

I don't know what you're talking about. There's no moving parts inside there except maybe the shutter (if there is a physical shutter).

I really don't have anything against Starbuck's. All the espresso they make tastes burnt to me, but that's just me. Also, your opinions are wrong.

That whole system looks like the reason nobody takes Sony "DSLRs" seriously. That and putting an APS-C sensor in their "high end" "SLR" "camera".

Okay, see that's an issue right there. If it has an EVF then why is there a mirror in the first place? Thinking outside the box is one thing but this just seems backwards. If the mirror doesn't reflect light into a pentaprism (or pentamirror) then it's not really an SLR. I'm super tired right now, but if you're…

Only certain amount of light is entering the camera through the lens. If you take 1/3 of a stop of light away from the sensor, then the sensor has to compensate for that, meaning you're not getting the absolute best picture that you could be getting. And if the focusing screen is only getting that 1/3 of a stop of…

The things people come up with for guns. I love it. From rebar-cutter attachments to the picatinny rail-mounted Glocks (a Glock that mounts under the forend of your rifle).

Do you mean "FREEZE"? Maybe, "ICE BURN".

So does the mirror move out of the way to shoot a picture or are they going to expect people to shoot pictures with only half the light or what? As cool as this camera looks and as cool as the translucent mirror thing sounds, it all doesn't sound as cool as gaining a full stop for exposure.

You can drink all the Starbuck's coffee you want, but the problem with that is that you're drinking Starbuck's coffee! No, seriously, though, Starbuck's coffee is awful.

Finally! Something I can do with my old ass-Kodak and Ica and Polaroid cameras. I may even break out the 4x5 to do this one.

@JuJuMonkeyBoy: B-52s are pretty sick. Watching them take off is crazy. It's like they're riding an escalator.