Because the cause of the rapes is conflict, war, and violence. Maybe the US shouldn't stick it's nose in everyone's business... so Africa, Asian, South American and Middle Eastern countries wouldn't be torn apart every few years to improve multinational corporations and arms dealers' bottom line.

You may kill or maim, but no rape. You see how ass backwards that is? You could never take away the US's love of killing for profit and power, but let's give them the moral high ground because they're against rape. So fucking full of shit.

"Hopefully"? are you shitting me? Civilians get killed in wars. Especially when the US invades and occupies. The civilians become the enemy. Vietnam war? Iraq war? Afghanistan? You can't separate the two. To say the US tries not to kill civilians is an utter fabrication.

So it's ok to kill people with bombs, bullets and through starvation, just don't rape them.

So painful to watch. Just not funny at all. And why would Sia even want it to be funny?

"They're both rich-as-hell white women." Talk about trying too hard. So are they supposed to be poor white women after they've both sold millions of albums? What is even the point of pointing out their whiteness? Would you be even more offended if they both completely ignored black and latino culture? Do you know a…

Yes I do, as I find it an appropriate term to use when describing a bunch of guys jerking off to weapons of murder and oppression. Don't you have a History Channel documentary about Hitler's secret weapons to watch?

I'm not ignorant of history, just sick that so much of it is drooling over the tools of man's worst instincts. This website is just a giant circle jerk to machines of death.

This is the gayest blog I've ever read in my life. Gawker has really gone down a loser rabbit hole with this one. A blog dedicated to military gadgetry. You people are fucking sick.

That's not Jesus, it's fucking Peter!

Gawker is NBC comedy's (oxymoron) biggest cheerleader. Do people really need posts written about what happened on last night's snl? It's paid advertising.

I know my networks. And I know there is nothing worse than sitcom centered around a lame comedian that has anything to do with Tina Fey and NBC, Judd Apatow or Comedy Central.

I will not be silenced. I will not waiver in my attack on Gawker's continued promotion of mediocre sitcoms through posts not labeled as paid advertising.

I'm glad to see someone has finally combined my two favorite American pastimes.

I'm a left wing neo con, what do you want from me?

Whatever. The amount of posts about tv shows on the Gawker site is nauseating. All of the shows come from that awful hotbed of mediocre comedic talent - NBC and Apatow.

File under Paid Advertising. This shit is getting pathetic. Is NBC underwriting Kinja?

But NBC is bourgeois. That has been their schtick since the late 1980s.

I can only imagine how much NBC pays Gawker to shill for their terribly bourgeois and mediocre programming. Jesus Christ, at least tag it as paid advertisement. We're not fucking stupid. It's just pathetic, Gawker should be on the forefront of blasting NBC for how lame and milk toast it's programming. Instead it's…

This is a Red Sox fan from Texas. That's all that needs to said. The onus falls on Texas.