Haven't they also already gone on record as saying Skulls in any form (Skrull or Chitauri) were not going to be in this movie what-so-ever?

Oh, how that would be fun to see play out.. I know its hardly the first or the last "The Horde" we'll ever see, but I'd love to see —if it happens to be that— Activision/Blizzard freak out over that.

They look pretty bad ass whoever they are.

Totally different fetish, lol.

Not sure who was actually first, but I'm fairly certain this started with Morgan Webb, before Munn was on G4, or any one actually cared she was on G4.

Yeah, when I saw that that was Chobot in Mass Effect 3, and saw what they made her wear (The series has uniforms that accentuate boobs, I get that.. But her cloths instantly registered in the "is that too far?" catagory) ,and then found out _____SPOILER_____ That she could also be a love interest, my eyes rolled back…

Makes sense though.. Not that I support it.. I mean, yeah we have people like Jessica Chobot and crap, but -for actual print magazines- no ones really cared about having a "gamer girl" in its pages since Morgan Webb was the (inexplicable) focus of everyone's attention (oddly enough in Maxim, I believe).. And that was…

Yeah, the context of that scene is totally messed up, lol. Like.. It's kind of okay until Lewis peeks in and then triple takes her way down the hall. You can literally see her thoughts saying "Murphey, you damn Robo-perve"

I'm kind of relieved to see that my negative thoughts over this movie aren't just me being my usual mostly-negative self, and others have them too.

He's in the sequel whenever they decide to release it -so there's still time.

"Your lack of faith is disturbing" has a whole new ring to it now.

I think this may have been the first time in the course of the series where I was okay with the fact that they failed at their plans. I mean, really didn't see the whole "kill the original, kill their bloodline" thing coming, and I really don't see how they could have. I think the only one who may have -might- have…

Well, I kinda said/thought that was before I really saw the whole picture and before privy to the idea/rules that real time meant since their movie was released, and not when they supposedly lived in real time.

Feel like theres a hidden "Yet" right at the end of the title, lol.

Finally found some time to comment on this episode..

Heres one then: This is a cross section of the ages of Disney Princesses. Really old, not so old, very new. 3 old, 2 not so and 2 very new, respectively -all of which adds a level of balance to the piece.

Well, even beyond that it'd be like stating that Cinderella is Rapunzel's grandmother or something — there isn't a link like that made in any of the stories that implies, let alone from Disney's twisting of those tales.

I see it as this: Losing a mother, someone who nurtured you, is much more dramatic then losing a father. Fathers, for all intent and purpose, seem to be replaceable, probably because we kind of take the same stance on that in real life -heck, even in how we mate.

Go to the link and the artist explains that newer princesses are drawn as children.. So yeah, Rapunzel is the girl in Cinderella's lap. Just look at the rather long blond hair.

Funny how a few lines denote age. If I looked at this quickly without knowing better I would have sword this was just the princesses sitting having tea with some kids. Or a nicely painted picture of cartoonish women.