I'm sorry if my comment came off as insulting. I didn't intend it to.
I'm sorry if my comment came off as insulting. I didn't intend it to.
This reads a little like all the men on here who insist that they have no advantages in life as a result of being male. If you're white you have certain advantages in life that black women don't have. For instance, if you knocked on someone's door in the middle of the night looking for help you'd be less likely to…
Oh lord, that's a horrible message to send to young men.
He is presumed innocent according to the law, but that doesn't mean we have to presume that the alleged victim is a liar, either.
I sort of agree in principle - after all, innocent until proven guilty and all that. Problem is, rape is often a 'he said/she said' crime. And a lot of rapists go through a lot of victims before anyone makes an accusation because the victims are afraid no one will believe them. However, when an accusation becomes…
If a man and a woman have no-strings attached, consensual sex for funzies, who is to say who is 'using' the other for sex?
Wait, so women who believe that a man accused of rape is innocent are idiots, right? Are men who insist that their football heroes are innocent also idiots? Please to be explaining your position more clearly.
I'd usually use 'complainant' rather than 'accuser' in this context.
The venn diagram of desirable men and men who troll Jezebel is two circles at opposite sides of a page, never coming close to touching one another.
Wow. Coming from a nation (and generation) in which a really, really small proportion of men are circumcised this is all so alien to me.
That's awful! Poor dude.
I don't know. Was the child residing in the father's body at the time? Had the mother already loudly said that she had no interest in raising the child and wished the father had aborted it?
You know nothing, el Suprehombre.
Dude, you guys showed up late both times and the Soviet Union definitely had the biggest role in winning the second one for the rest of us. No joke.
You're all over the place here. First you praise the UK because they allow nudity on TV, then you complain about laws infringing on free speech. You say that people should be allowed to say whatever they want and then suffer the consequences. Now that is the law in the USA. You can get on TV and say whatever…
If someone saying 'Happy Holidays' offends you then maybe you're the one being too PC? Surely the only rational thing to do is to not be offended whether someone wishes you Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays or Cheerful Monday?
It's a bit rich to hear complaints about people 'riling up accusatory 'RACISM' bait' from someone defending the decision to liken a Gawker media post to fascism.
It's no different than how a real life fascistic cop/military-police would have zero tolerance in how they mete out justice and control a situation without giving the other side a chance to voice out their side of the story.
This. Seriously, I will give 10 internet dollars if the OP can actually define fascism.
I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark and guess that you've never actually studied the birth of fascism in Europe if you think people kvetching about a pop singer's outfit is in any way analogous to its rise.