No but as usual the ability to bitch and moan over how victimized you are by the video game industry is still free.
No but as usual the ability to bitch and moan over how victimized you are by the video game industry is still free.
They did price Kinect 2.0 at $99.... and made it part of the system.
If this the exact same mode and shouldn't bother with it then why bother with the single player game either? Let's play a mix of DA1, ME games, Baldur's gate and Divinity for eternity?
Your points are a little silly dude, you don't want the mode because it will distract critique? Really?
Considering all they've focused on up until this point is everything they've added to the Single Player campaign I don't know where your complaint is coming from?
The ME3 multiplayer team was a different department, working in a different city, than the team working on the main game. In fact the multiplayer team kept creating new multiplayer content for a year after the last single player DLC came out.
Speak for yourself. I love horde modes. I was hoping for a horde mode DLC for The Last of Us as I think it would quite a bit of fun.
If it's as fun as it was in Mass effect 3, I got no complaints. That I had absolutley no faith at all in Mass effects having multiplayer, but I enjoyed it tremendusley.
Yes! I knew it! This could be so very cool. Though Serebii reports it's an arcade game. Does that mean an arcade-style Wii U game or just an actual arcade game? Because the latter would be the worst business move Nintendo could ever make. It's out 2015.
Yes, people are ok with the concept of rental subscription services. Gamefly, Netflix, Hulu, Crunchyroll, Spotify, all have been services people have enjoyed. But yeah, lets act like another subscription rental service is the end of days and anyone that might like the option is the spawn of Satan.
*****Spoiler******
You talk like you're forced to get on board with this.
As long as I'm still able to buy a copy of the games, I'm ok
I prefer a company that learns from lots of mistakes than a company that refuses to learn from a few.
You should be fired.
No it's absolutely not. At least in the context you are using. We don't convict on probability and we shouldn't in the public view either.
While his response is odd... I find this post a bit more troubling. It seems like this post is saying "we're going with Temkin's version of events happened, but..."
Actually, I got the (terrifying) impression that people are trying to make the case that awkward making-out can be considered rape if one of the participants wasn't really into it.
This article is loaded with gold: