Blankenstein
Blankenstein
Blankenstein

They sued under two heads of damages: wrongful birth and breach of duty. The damages available may be different for each and the elements to prove a breach are going to be different. It may be easier to prove wrongful birth than breach of duty (I don't know). But if there's an arguable case that the elements of

She's not asking for anyone to take the child back. She and her wife love Payton and have bonded with her. But there is nothing wrong with suing the company that can't even keep it's record-keeping in check to send the right sample and holding it accountable for it's major f***-up. And yeah, the law is an inelegant

The child has typical african-american hair. They have to travel to a black neighborhood where there is a salon with someone who has that skill and can cut her hair. Apparently, the mother hasn't felt welcome in that area as a white woman.

They wanted to buy more vials to put in storage for when they were ready to have another baby. She was pregnant when she called to purchase more vials.

And we should tell the sperm banks they shouldn't worry and they'll be litigation proof because the public will shame anyone who thinks there's a problem with a medical facility screwing up so monumentally that they sent the wrong sperm to the wrong person?

Nope. They realized the mistake when they wanted to buy more vials to put in storage so they could get pregnant again in a couple of years. She was pregnant with Payton when she discovered the mistake. She called and asked for 380 and they said (paraphrasing) "You mean 330, the African American sperm we sent you a few

She found out about the mistake when she was pregnant. Ordered vials from 380 in August/September that didn't take. Ordered more vials for insemination over the Fall months. Those were the mistaken 330 vials. She became pregnant in December 2011. When she was pregnant with Payton she wanted to ordered more vials from

I'm guessing that even with the most iron-clad legal agreements, often the "best interests of the child" will often win out in determining who owes support. That may also translate to the "best interests of the State that would rather a private individual foot the bill for a child's care rather than the social welfare

Well, depends on your jurisdiction of course, and what laws there are covering the issue, but generally speaking, if there are no laws protecting you, you could be arrested and/or charged for destroying the vehicle owner's property (the window) and s/he could sue you for the cost of the repairs to the vehicle. If the

The wigs scream Cleopatra/ancient Egyptian, don't they?

5. Janelle Monae. And that is the Tadashi Shoji cape.

Is no one else creeped out by the fact that he's standing in front of a TON of scientology certificates???? New OT 1, the State of Clear, etc...

In the original post by Blind Gossip, they state that a trusted friend was in charge of filming the encounter.

Or, use www.AnnualCreditReport.com which is run by the big three credit reporting agencies and is required by US Federal law to be free (I believe 3 times a year, one for each of the big three).