The problem with this theory is having to take the Pokémon to the hospital considering that the poke ball would be so advanced that it can alter the Pokemon’s state of being without the need of a hospital.

Yeah, this definitely seems like the only logical explanation of what’s taking place in this completely fictional world of fire-breathing dragons, electric rats, and sentient ice cream cones.

What if it’s the TRON concept, where the subject is digitized and stored as data, but it retains consciousness and sense of self while inside the Pokeball. It could still be “experiencing” the Pokeball as a luxury accommodation, but exist solely as code. Flynn’s apartment was pretty swanky in TRON Legacy.

If that’s the case then wouldn’t it be pointless to capture Pokemon at all? You could essentially replicate the data. So anyone could just download a copy of a pokemon of their choice and transfer it to a pokeball.

WE GET IT. Pokemon is a sanctuary of uncanny valley theories.

I thought you said “Paper Metroid” for a second and I was confused, yet intrigued.

Remember, combing handheld and their home console will mean they can develop more games for this. I’m hopeful.

Ok but the real question is still are we getting a god damn proper metroid on this frigging thing??

Dare to dream the impossible dream.

Better be a Metroid game.

If this is combining with their handheld department, Nintendo actually has a LOT more potential exclusives. After all, the Nintendo 3DS has something like 180 games that never came out anywhere else.

Both on the same day, no less. Now I (and several others on this site, judging by the comments) are wondering if it’s more than just a coincidence.

Actually if it is both hadheld and gome console...then yes...Nintendo can supply the machine itself

And yet, Nintendo is doing way better than Sega. Like, a lot better.

As someone who hasn’t cared for practically anything Nintendo has done since the Gamecube, I would love for the NX to excite me.

Please don’t drop the ball again, Nintendo.

Me and my friend are pumped!

Was going to say the same thing, the logo is blatantly visable. The thing is though, that’s not copyrighted, that’s not what a copyright is at all. At best it’s trademark use but there are exceptions for trademark use that would cover this very thing. I’m notmally one to jump in here and defend a corporation from a…

This unequivocally falls under the parody clause for fair use. Maybe Samsung should focus on shipping a product that doesn’t explode instead of pettily shutting down some youtuber.

”No logo, image or even the word ‘Samsung’ was uttered/shown in the video.”