BigDSweetz
DJay
BigDSweetz

It also depends on who starts creating for what first. For instance, look at FFXIII. Both of the games look amazing, but the PS3 version smokes the Xbox version. Also, games that fully utilize the hardware show you exactly what you can do with the systems. I really thought that the Xbox wasn't worth shit graphically

Add some beats by dre and you'd have an epidemic.

The best way to describe this would be to look at the PS3 patch that just came out that had an effect on a lot of users. I'm sure they tested it before they released it, but it still nerf'd a lot of consoles. Then they released a patch for the patch after they found out the new problem. Also, patching something may

The problem with that is Sony is know to rip idea and then run off and create something on their own. Point in case, that's how the Playstation got it's life to begin with. The idea was taken from Nintendo back in the day. I'm just saying. I'd like to see Google and Sony match up, but I can see a very bad break up

Negative there ghost rider. They are sitting on about 10 billion (us currency). They could easily buy Atlus. I think this would be just as bad as if SquareEnix bought them.

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

One better, had someone remake the intro for me.

Amen. They all went downhill after this.

Don't feed the trolls.

Your totally pulling this out of context. If you dress up a certain way, people ARE going to look at you. That's just human nature. If I walk around on FIRE people are going to look. Point being, if you dress up a certain way your going to get attention. I'm not condoning being a pig, but I will say that your (not

Winning!

It was supposed to end there. The show became so popular that they forced the show to go on. True Story.

And please tell me how many MILLION they made with both of those? In fact, when is the last time you've seen either of those two anywhere but in an Arcade? Why, because it's like the article stated. They are novelty, and once it wears off, your getting owned by people playing on a controller. I'm telling you right

I really would love to believe that. I tell you what, if there was a retail store on there in competition w/ Microsoft I'd be all for it, but I don't really see it happen. I'd really like to eat crow on this one, but I just don't see it coming around that way.

you still never answered my question. Show me where now Microsoft has lowered the price of the games that are now out. You make my point by showing that because of a choice, the prices are cheaper. If we remove that, then what incentive does Microsoft have to lower their prices? You bring up Minecraft, but you do

I really think that they won't do that any time soon. Everytime they've tried it they've gotten kicked in the teeth.

Correction. OLD people resist change. a LOT of people voted on this with their money and M$ lost. I said in another post that if M$ had give people the option to opt in, this would have been different. I would have gladly paid up for the same service if given the ability to choose to do it.

Who said you still can't download the games? They never recanted the ability to have day 1 digital downloads.

Where does everyone get this awesome idea that if we buy into M$ they are going to lower prices. Here's a better question, when the hell are they going to start lowering the prices on the games they have out NOW. (Go check the prices of the Xbox digital games now and then go do a Amazon search for the same game new