I didn’t want to spoil anything for someone who hasn’t played SO3. That’s clearly the movie, but it’s different imo. (still not wanting to spoil anything).

You misunderstand. The PSP remake of Star Ocean 1 and 2 wasn’t very good. 3 wasn’t cringe worthy in my opinion. But there is no point in arguing about it.

Um, you are wrong. We could do this all day.

You know... I think my friend just got into my head. I was having a good time and then he mentioned something he hated about the PSP version and it was like a brick to the head. I remember telling him that it was dumb, but like a virus it slowly got to me.

That good huh? I really should go back and play 2 again then.

Oh, Craziest Plot Twist. I’m trying to think if someone else has done it since. I don’t want to ruin anything. There is a movie that comes close, but the entire feel is completely different and it’s not exactly the same. I think scientists actually have contemplated if it’s true.

If you haven’t played it, man... The second half of the game is a trip.

It probably depends on the person. Star Ocean 3 is my personal favorite. But then I tried the PSP remakes of the older ones and they were cringe worthy. I did like the original 2, but Star Ocean 3 just went completely bonkers in the second half.

Okay. Also, I’m not willing to commit to that conversation either.

When Clark Kent represses his powers. Pretends he doesn’t have infinite vision or power. Hides behind a persona who isn’t himself, he’s in disguise. His personality, his good nature, his real self is like you say his real self from being raised properly. But part of me doesn’t believe that Clark Kent isn’t…

Superman has to be a professional and be good at his job. It’s part of his disguise. If it were Spiderman pretending to be mild mannered Peter Parker, I suspect he would try harder to keep up appearances.

That is awesome! Keeping in mind I never saw that superman I can only assume it was a very very very dry conversation beforehand.

It would... But is it really being sold as a handheld? I honestly don’t know. If it is, I’m afraid it will screw up their handheld market which is fantastic. Games are cheap to make meaning that developers get to try new things.

Uh. That sounds great. Why aren’t they doing this? It’s not like the inner sides of the box really need extra art. You could have story. In fact, you wouldn’t really need to use a side of the box for controls since almost every game uses the same control layout, you could probably get away with a xeroxed pamphlet…

I can see how this “joke” started and ended. Hey, I’ll do something stupid. Nobody would ever take that job for $5. Oh crap, someone really needed $5. The end.

Hmm, it’s a neat idea when you think about it. $200 will buy you maybe one or two locations. But you will probably make it all the way around without too much harm since there is less bought property. But $50 for jail would be a nightmare.

That’s a toss up. You used to be able to buy all the houses and prevent others from buying. In theory people could even bribe you to build a hotel to free up houses onto the market...

Well, houses are scary in the normal game. Hotels were added in later iterations, but it really ruined the best trick behind the game. IE, MONOPOLY! You buy up all the houses and once they are all gone, you are on easy street since nobody can buy anymore houses. And thus can’t buy hotels.

Really? Auctioning? I only know one other person I’ve run across that knew that. Heck, I only know it because I played the NES, Gameboy and iPhone versions.

Yeah... It’s probably just an advertising gimmick, but they specifically say, “Even the dog isn’t safe”.