That's true, he did abandon her first. But I don't think it would necessarily be that easy for her unless she had proof he was dead or had evidence of a lot of effort to find and divorce him first. 

How does someone get banned from a game 80 times? Did they make 80 accounts or were these not actual bans but temporary suspensions?

Your reasoning as a response to their reasoning is less sound theirs was.

¿Por que no los dos?

I’m sure it’s “possible” but with an asterisk the size of a tiger’s butthole.

What’s most important is with either iteration of the quote the dude is pretty damn spot on. I can count on one hand the number of F2P games that I played that are actually what I would call fun.

Yeah that was never more than a lie to make people think it was a good idea. They never would have done it. 

I get what you’re going for here but your explanation of how it would work is a perfect example of “having to make up some silly plot reasons to bypass a massive hole” that I was talking about lol.

Doesn’t your plot have the same major hole that you point out for this game? Couldn’t they just go back to their time and say “Hey let’s tell someone we know and trust, have them start a blog and when you die they’ll write what happened” and then jump one year ahead and read it? If he can jump back to have his kid try…

Everyone is going to be different but it largely depends on the glitch and the game structure for me.

Not that I disagree with it being posted because it was an enjoyable read, but it seems silly to have a review for a game when you've already published two posts about this game, one being that it sucks, and the other being that it sucks so much the developer isn't making games anymore. 

I get that this is a tricky situation but I don’t see the issue with either party merely suggesting that social media remove specific items, as long as there’s no threat of or actual repercussions if they fail to do so. I guess the power dynamic between the two groups can be considered an implied threat though, so I…

I want to see a Batman movie where he actually has difficulty solving a string of robberies performed by the Riddler. He always thinks he has the riddle figured out before the robbery but keeps getting it wrong.

Sure, but this is still better than <Everything you said> + Lightning lol.

I’m not surprised that the author fails to understand why this is actually pretty innovative and different from “lol boats already had sails before” but I’m surprised at the comments on the post doing the same thing. Usually the comments are pretty good at calling out why the author’s take on something is stupid but…

Maybe that’s what I’m not clear on. The text of the post isn’t really explicit on exactly *what* the cheaters see, and in the image they show two “players” that are fully visible, with the caption indicating that one is a fake.

Discocunt is entering my vernacular as well. That's rad. 

I’m not following what this actually accomplishes.

Really the solution for whether or not people do fatalities should be easy. Either player can opt to skip it or watch it. Then there's no rudeness involved, if you do it go ahead and watch and the other person can just tap the skip button and queue up for a rematch or choose a different opponent.