No, but some call Asheville, NC the SF of the east. That counts right?

In my experience crust punks or gutter punks are pretty unobtrusive and harmless to others. The worst you can expect is a seething look of resentment for being complicit in part of a violent and consumerist culture, but that's to be expected. We need to be reminded of these things from time to time anyway.

In NC I feel like Tesla is the car that owners get sick of talking about. Everyone I talk to about their Tesla gets that look of "Oh god, please go away."

Oh yeah, Big Boss is good, but not my go-to like Foothills is. There are only one or two beers in their all-season lineup that I enjoy, but all of their specialty/seasonal beers are excellent. Aces & Ates (coffee stout), Night Knight (black IPA) and Dueces Wild (double IPA) are some of my all-time favorites.

IMO: Seeing Double > Jade IPA > Hoppyum

Of course not. I just fail to understand how saying that most of the Deadspin site is not objective and that it will be inconsequential in 10 years is constructive. It's just somebody word vomiting a reaction with no evidence supporting a sloppy barely-argument based on some pre-conceived opinion they were already…

Then why did you not only read the article (I assume you read it right?), but take the time to comment? Why waste your time typing out an unconstructive, unfounded criticism opinion, much less the url address?

What's up with the youth? (

"DAMMMMMNNNNNNNN"

"DAMMMMNNNNNNNN"

Came to say the exact same thing. All was forgiven when Cincinnati chili was put behind "being hit by car" on the list.

The Raiders logo is nearly flawless:

Woman #2: [ appoaches the door ] Yes?

Land Shark: [ muffled voice ] Mrs. Arlsbergerhh??

Woman #2: Who?

Land Shark: [ muffled voice ] Mrs. Johnannesburrrr??

Woman #2: Who is it?

Land Shark: [ muffled voice ] Flowers.

Woman #2: Flowers? From whom?

Land Shark: [ muffled voice ] Plumber, ma'am..

Woman #2: I don't need a…

They look like Daniel Clowes characters.

I can understand your frustration with people who appear to "inject race" as you say, into seemingly inconsequential and non-racial issues because if the issue of race is never officially being addressed by either party involved then it doesn't seem logical to address it all. So when you say there's zero evidence or…

Why is it so important to argue this point that race isn't a factor? Are we supposed to believe that while the NCAA carries out unfair and unethical rulings and punishments that there's no way they could also be prejudiced to certain races? Even if you're right—which remain's to be seen given what these supposed…

You're right. Even if you don't want to address race, by ignoring it you're ignoring part of the problem, which in this case seems pretty obvious. It's not about always looking for racial implications like this person is suggesting but even if it were would that be so wrong?

+1