To follow up, saying that the replication crisis in social sciences is due to the use of self-report data collection methods shows a complete lack of understanding of the crisis and its causes, which shows up in many fields.

Your food analogy is pretty apt, given that blanket criticising an entire cuisine and the people who make it in comparison to a cuisine you prefer is actually really rude.

No that’s not why, given that biomedicine has the exact same reproducibility problem.

The premise of the article is that the nudity and sexuality should only be portrayed if the viewer, in this case Julie Muncy, can justify it for an artistic reason.

Ok. Citation needed for:

“he also seems to have some sort of anger in him”

Critically examining the way that nudity and sexuality are portrayed is not the same thing as saying it shouldn’t be portrayed at all, this doesn’t come under ‘fear of nipples’.

I agree in general, but in this instance critically examining the way that nudity and sexuality are portrayed is not the same thing as saying it shouldn’t be portrayed at all. It’s a narrative device that can be used well and badly.

Critically examining the way that nudity and sexuality are portrayed is not the same thing as saying it shouldn’t be portrayed at all. Does this really need to be explained?

You’ve got a lot of assumptions there in your comment, many of which are not actually backed up by evidence.

You never begin with “I mean.” You start a sentence with “I mean” when you’re about to clarify a point made in a previous sentence, unless you’re a whiny, 13 year-old girl.

Yes, could there possibly be some sort of... historical difference in the way that men and women’s sexualities and appearances have been treated, meaning that the ‘same’ treatment of each gender has a different impact given the different contexts?

Well, Sophie Turner isn’t actually a redhead either to be fair.

It was an auction

‘a bunch of people who have absolutely nothing to do with the situation and who the situation has no personal effect on’

Nah, denouncing others for ‘virtue signalling’ and being offended is the new badge of being somehow more genuine and less performative than others.

‘Innocent until proven guilty’ only applies to the court of law, not opinions.

“I just want to really get across I am not taking a side in this whole thing”

You’re scientifically and socially wrong, as you’re basing your view on old and outdated science.

To use your own “example” When a woman is infertile, she is still a woman, or female or whatever you want to name it. You don’t suddenly cease being what you are.