Oh no, honey. It means you’ve made a ridiculous unsupported statement that you can’t even be bothered backing up.
Oh no, honey. It means you’ve made a ridiculous unsupported statement that you can’t even be bothered backing up.
It’s definitely not true.
That’s incredibly offensive due to gay people having hardly anything in entertainment (lesbians get everything and they haven’t suffered like us)
You’re right, you don’t know what it is.
Yeah but you’re not going to have many viewers who are survivors of throat slittings or geldings.
But is it, though?
One may say that society is sexist and this flows into how TV casting and networks work. You might say that (straight) male audiences are currently disproportionately pandered to in most television shows.
But you wouldn’t say that more men than women watch TV, or that the male audience is more…
1. You’re assuming the 18-24 target demographic is primarily straight male.
Hey, at least they don’t use the word entrée for the main course!
No, there is no reason to use the person’s dead name. You can just say ‘Reginald Smith accomplished blah blah’.
I imagine it’s also at least partially due to the prevalence of behaviour focussed ‘therapies’ that entirely ignore the internal experiences that are triggering the behavioural coping mechanisms in favour of pressuring us to appear ‘normal’.
Cracker stuff! This episode was really tense.
Oh he was definitely racist even for his time.
Ah, well, they can’t all be winners I guess.
No, because that’s not what she was getting at. She’s making a pretty long, subtle point.
Wonder Woman is wonderfully fit.
Firstly, they’re not a species. They’re a ruling class amongst gallifreyans.
I don’t think you could say an entire species isn’t queer.
FYI, calling people ‘transgenders’ is weird, it’s like calling gay people ‘gays’.
I’ve never heard puff before, but ‘poof’, yeah.
Ah I see. That makes more sense.