I don't think you quite understand what a bigot is. Someone not approving of your internet comment and requesting more considerate behaviour certainly is not it.
I don't think you quite understand what a bigot is. Someone not approving of your internet comment and requesting more considerate behaviour certainly is not it.
I don't think you understood my point. Actually, I wish I wasn't right, and that men and women were treated equally by society and the media.
You were saying that the way men are drawn in comics (usually jacked up with gigantic muscles) is what women generally like sexually. It is not.
If you have a look around at stuff like Yaoi and the massive female fan bases for men like Benedict Cumberbatch and Tom Hiddleston you'll find that straight women often like male bodies which are not extremely muscular. So the big muscles are not really drawn with women in mind.
My family's dog is sweet looking Jack Russel, yet for some reason he just loves killing pigeons when given the chance. For example on one walk we took him on, after catching one he caught and killed another and started chasing a third with the second one still in his mouth, wings sticking out either side of his…
Advertising is specifically designed to manipulate us at a level below conscious awareness and choice, so being aware that it is coercive doesn't actually help us resist it.
You'd better take up a case against the entire advertising industry then, as there are far more coercive tactics going around than this one.
In any case, trying to make people only make the best choices is indistinguishable from tyranny, no matter how good the intentions. I would bet money that you yourself sometimes make less-than-optimal decisions, that increase your risks of misadventure.
It's the whole 'squished together' thing that's unrealistic. Boobs (natural ones, at least) do not squish together without an article of clothing that pushes them into each other.
Clark Spencer Lawson ("According to Clark Spencer Larsen, modern day homo sapiens show a relatively narrow range of sexual dimorphism, with average body mass difference between the sexes being roughly equal to 15% (compared to most primates and anthropoids, ranging 50-55%)") is an established, respected…
If you leave a melanoma untreated it will not have 'minimal consequences'. It's probably better to try to avoid incurring sun damage rather than using resources of the medical system to treat preventable problems that could be better used elsewhere.
He, the joint creator of the format and the name of the format is wrong? How?
How about giraffe?
You didn't read that article, did you? It specifically states that human physical sexual dimorphism is minor compared to even other primates. It also states that the nature of human behavioural dimorphism is still highly contested in scientific circles.
Homo sapiens is one of the most sexually dimorphic species we know.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You know one of the creators of the format reckons it should be pronounced like that right? Apparently he intended it to be pronounced like 'Jiff' the peanut butter brand.
It's lower now because of a coordinated campaign to educate people of the need for proper sun protection. A lot of people get melanoma but don't die because our healthcare system is great, but it would be better if less people got skin cancer in the first place.
No. Skin cancer is "the national cancer" of Australia, with everyone knowing at least one person who has had to have melanomas removed from their skin. It is a real risk that we have to consider regularly throughout our lives.