AphexNinja
ApheXNinjA
AphexNinja

Being 25, and a year into an amazingly lucky career... I'll be buying a car soon. I fit right into this category they're trying to appeal to.. and all I can say is; "If my phone can already do it, I don't want it in my car."

The car itself, how it looks, how it drives... is 50x's more important to anyone that I know.

Why bother with the consoles? That's a complete waste of money. Name ONE exclusive that makes buying them worth it?

And even if there is ONE good one, it's not nearly enough to make me or anyone with a brain buy a console over a PC.

Well, it's obvious we're going to agree to disagree here.

But, what makes you think that GTAV won't have any DLC's? And also expand to the Xbox One, PS4 and PC?

I will agree that Rockstars budget of $290 million for GTA V was pretty spectacular. BUT, even with a smaller budget, battlefield shouldn't be as bad as it is.

You're a snarky son of a gun, aren't you?

In response to your logic, Rockstar took 5 years on GTA V and made a billion dollars in 3 days... I think their way of doing things is a bit better than rushing games out the door every 2 years.

Battlefield is actually my favorite first person shooter, so far I've put in 109

I remember when games actually went through a Q&A process that involved testing the game on more than a handful of machines... I also remember games not having nearly as many issues. Sure, BF4 is a big game, but that's no excuse for the way it turned out. I love many, many aspects of the game... but the fact that bugs

It seems to me that Jon's satire went over your head Brian...

Definitely not an open and shut case, and everyone is going to have their own opinion.

I agree with your list, but would add Tribes 2 to the list, as well as some of the mods for HL (Counter-Strike, Teamfortress, and even Left 4 Dead) — I am, however, biased towards Valve as they've never done me wrong. And make games

And what games do you suggest are much greater than that of the half-life series?

Haha, while I can agree with that too — There's two books. One that's tarnished, but loved. And one that's pristine and loved.

What I'm trying to say is there's rich guys who are into driving nice cars that cost a pretty penny — and there's guys who enjoy driving their older cars that they spent a lot of love on

I agree, to an extent. ~$130,000 for the black edition GT-R or ~$70,000 for the ZR1 package... both get you into the "I'm serious about my car" range. Driving ability aside of course. ; )

Ahh, the poor mans super car becomes even more super! Seriously.. I can't wait to buy one in a few years time.

Condoms? Psh, who needs them? Don't bang venereal ridden whores, and learn to control your ham log and you'll be A-Okay. ; )

Don't see any reason for all the hate. It's pretty damn stellar. A car company actually thinking outside the box, blending old with the new in a more creative manner than the new camaro's or chargers. I'd buy one if the performance matched the looks.

I've watched this a few times now... and the attack heli warps into frame... also, the transport heli he was looking at originally just warps....

What is going on here?!?

Top Tip: Be Awesome. Profit.

That... that is epic as hell. Though a rock going 400mph out the back of this would be one scary experience. Haha

Hey, that is a cool little car. Haha

Eh — So, as I said, there are SOME notable highlights. The GTO Being one. BUT... it honestly still has a lot of flaws in my mind... and is definitely not the style of Ferrari I'd own. Is it still awesome? Hell yes. Is it designed well? Meh, could of been better.

I will forever think cars from the 1980s are hideous... I haven't been proven wrong yet. Haha... don't get me wrong, there are SOME notable highlights, of SOME cars — BUT, most produced were absolutely, staggeringly, and jaw-droppingly awful.