Revolutionized is a bit strong of a term. He's a good defensive gameplanner and is great at making lemonade out of lemons with personnel, but schematically he hasn't invented dick. He has taken the best of other peoples' ideas and melded them together.

AHHHMMM I REAL FACKIN' FOOTBALL FAN! FACK YOU!

Right? Ugh both these cats are utter losers.

Jesus, both these dudes are just epic fucking losers.

I think they're expressing an attraction to said personality, talent and wit, rather than his physical features.

Damn. I just googled Kate Norley. John Oliver definitely didn't 'dun goof' with that one. Good for him.

It's very very important to note here that the parents are not physicians. Even if they had a proton beam in their basement they wouldn't be qualified to use it. Packing iron supplements and Children's Tylenol is not just as good as being in the care of physicians in a hospital.

Um yeah, but they aren't physicians right? I am of the opinion that the authorities have over-reacted here, but I can't help but analogize this to parents who don't vaccinate their children. The only doctors involved in this story thought that removing him from treatment in the UK was a bad idea. That should tell…

Because Samer is a Pats homer.

Si, muy caliente.

He is by far the best pure passer in the league. His game has flaws sure, but the man has some epic court vision.

That's really kind of sad. But kinda true.

Agreed.

I watched that game on my second night after moving to London. Due to the time difference, the game didn't end till something like 4:30am and I was drunk as fuck. I was watching the game with two gorgeous blonde Steelers fans, one of who I legitimately had a shot with, but whom I chose to forsake after the game…

Who wants to take bets that the "Mark" who wrote in about Joe Namath is a professional football player in Philadelphia?

I humbly suggest the Jets have the best D line in football. SONS OF ANARCHY!

If I counted right, that's 8 instances. 30,000 Americans fly every day. Even if these all occurred on the same day (they didn't), you're talking about a 0.027% chance of this happening. To be clear, anything other than a 0% chance is unacceptable, but statistically speaking the likelihood of this happening to you…

Or maybe set a big lowercase 't' on fire.....for 'time to leave'?

Ok, this comment bothers me quite a bit. Apart from this one incident do you have any data to suggest sexual assault on airplanes is a common thing? If you do, then I stand corrected, but if not, you're just being hysterical. The close quarters, lack of privacy and plethora of witnesses on airplanes might possibly…

Brilliant. +1