Nailed it.

That's not what he was saying. He was saying he thinks it's counterproductive to create a "seperate but equal" system for porn that says female sexuality is this and male sexuality is that. It's like Dan Savage says, if something exists, it has been fetishized by someone at some point, that's just the nature of…

Haha, no. You must be new here. All women are snowflakes and all men are interchangeable cogs in the patriarchy who exist for the sole purpose to destroy the snowflakes. Implying male sexuality is not monolithic, misogynistic and inherently degrading to women is not a permissible notion 'round these parts.

I am totally turned off by porn that focuses on male pleasure rather than female pleasure. I want porn whereby women are the sexual aggressors not the men.

Yes. Thank you. Human sexuality is so weird. Anyone that dictates guidelines about what porn is ok and what porn isn't ok for women is being inherently anti-feminist.

I'm sure there are some women out there who dig that kind of thing. Mandating what 'porn for women' should be (or in this case, should not be) is anti-feminist, because it means one group is dictating terms to the other. Isn't that how 'the patriarchy' works?

That's such a myopic viewpoint, and goes directly at what he's saying. What about people who are into domination, humiliation, chastity, cuckolding, etc? For those people arousal is inherently associated the lack of pleasure they receive relative to their partner . Stop trying to put sexuality in a box with clearly…

I was in the process of moving to London when this happened. It was my second night there, I had just turned 22 (so I was even more of an idiot that I am now) and got blasted drunk watching this game in the only bar that would stay open to 4am and show American football.

"IRS, Treasury announce special 'heterosexuality tax'"

I would....

It's funny because the Jets suck....

As a Jets fan, I really couldn't be more excited about this. The media begins to make a spectacle of itself and publicly self-destruct (just like the Jets themselves), and it drives small subset of Deadspin commenters sick of hearing about the Jets blind with rage.

God, how awful does he have to be to have been beaten out by Vince Young? Even The Bills thought he was terrible.

Hockey. Maple Syrup. Free health care. Taxes.

Because the south is 100% white southern boys.

You're going to be such a great mom.

Bullshit. Sexual pleasure cannot be quantified. It's totally subjective and personal. And it's not mutilation because the vast majority of cut men don't have a problem with it. Presumably you're not a man so maybe you should leave this issue to us. Circumsized or not its none of your business unless its your kid.

Could not agree more. I don't get why people around here get so butthurt over the issue.

It's not genital mutilation though. Comparing it to something like clitorectomy is not appropriate because sexual function is not mitigated.

The statistics nonetheless bear out that women cost more to the system. Actuarially, this cannot be disputed, your anecdotal (and stereotypical!) observations about the lifestyle choices of men notwithstanding.