What about the women that didn't end up on the video, who felt shamed because they didn't want to? What about the women who felt shamed by being approached by random strangers and asked to engage in a sex act in public - but for charity!

Obviously you assume that since you didn't see any women become visibly flustered or embarrassed or humiliated, that there weren't any. It just magically happened that every single woman they asked was down for it and had fun. They didn't edit out anyone at all. Nope. There were no women who went home feeling dirty…

Oh my god, this invitation has about 99 problems, and that's one of them. Also:

They are manipulating women for charity. Don't want to participate? Don't you want to help those poor girls? Just let us try to humiliate you and film it!

I'm far from a prude and I think this is ridiculous. Lets be real here. These guys are using charity as a front so they can get women to sexualize themselves on camera and gain attention to their channel. That is it. Let's not fool ourselves into thinking it's anything more than that, and please stop saying that this…

Oh, I wasn't accusing you of trampling! I'm just saying that there is no accepted term. People who advocate for the use of "mutilation" do so for the very reasons you say. "Circumcision" seems too mild for what it is.

I think the point of this is that the guys would only donate to a female-oriented charity if they got to make women masturbate themselves on camera in public. If the women themselves were fronting the money and masturbating for attention for the cause, it would be different.

ToneDeezy, the point being made is that they are continually using women as their subjects in these videos. Not only that, they're asking them to engage in sexualized behaviors for nothing more than the guys' enjoyment.

As a crazy naked exhibitionist, that is not the point.

But Aaaack! She's appropriating Josie and the Pussy Cats! How will Josie and the cast of Cats ever forgive her for superficially misrepresenting their culture!

"What that something was is unclear, but the ad featured a winky face, which is always a sign that someone is up to no good."

After the initial, massive shudder, all I could think was "Christ that sounds dangerous!" Horse are big animals, and being ON TOP of one comes with its risks. Being UNDERNEATH one? Yipes.

"I wanna blow a horse...

Can't we just agree to give him to Russia?

I've been waiting for months for a legitimate excuse to post this gif.

That's what I was coming here to say. Moreover, whatever Nigella Lawson may or may not have done, she did it without harming or annoying her neighbors. Bieber's misdeeds actually affect other people.

That was exactly my response. Good riddance to this spoiled twat (and let Nigella in!).

Getting ready for a party at Bryan Singer's mansion.