Soooo ... why are you taking shots at people who simply believed what Esquire reported?

Summary of yesterday's article: "Miss America got kicked out of her sorority for hazing! We speculate what she could have done." It was the level of reporting you find in InTouch ("Kim and Kanye engaged! What their wedding could look like!"). It's really too bad, too, because they muddied that great scoop about her…

Terrible article.

sounds like Timmy Marchman didn't get his gift basket #ButtHurt

having his contract terminated isn't paying a price?

What does 4chan have to do with Reddit?

Invasion of privacy aside, she looks amazing in those shots. Who thought that's what she looks like under the hood with that baby face of hers?

clicks don't bait themselves.

Story should be titled: "I'm was a slightly above average punter who should have kept my outspoken mouth shut because punters are a dime a dozen and I have no real value to an NFL team; now I am upset that I am not making easy money spending 45 seconds kicking a ball in the most violent league in the United States…

Explain how exactly you are entitled to birth control as part of your compensation for work? I'd like my employer to pay for booze and fast women for me, but that ain't happening. Hell, I'd settle for a gym membership.

'Hotspur' is singular, you ignorant American poseur.

I thought she just tweeted it and Buzzfeed picked it up? Their article on the topic certainly makes it sound so. It makes sense she'd insist to Buzzfeed later on that it was real if it was a hoax perpetrated on her. Maybe she did think she was doing the right thing because someone who has harassed other women was…

How long till deadspin publishes an article claiming 'crap' has racial overtones?

What a stupid post. None of those people are "the most hated men in Washington," and nothing at all is surprising about an NFL time hiring top marketing people when faced with any kind of "controversy," however legitimate. "The most offensive team name in professional sports." Here's an idea: Get over yourselves, and…

THATS RACIST!!!!

Well, you just wrote an article with the word "thug" in it 24 times which would skew your own results, so I guess Regressing must be racist too.

We called him classless, a bad sportsman, a troll. We called him a monkey and a nigger.

This is the problem: if you don't agree with the way Gawker handles things, you're automatically a racist. The narrative that Deadspin's cultivated is strictly bipolar, and it's maddening, the equivalent of conservatives saying that if you don't agree with them, you hate America.

How many times was "thug" uttered on Deadspin? Possibly almost as much as repeat offenders "Closing Bell" (in which corporate thugs and Russian business are often the topic of conversation) and "The Bad Girls Club" (in which, well, God knows what happens there). Way to keep the moral high ground. We wouldn't want to…

So was it a mistake to recommend this piece last week?