that's the whole fucking point - this guy clearly can't make a livelihood posting videos on youtube anymore and he's crying like a bitch about it. Now Kotaku want's to make google out to be a bad guy because they won't host this guy's videos.
that's the whole fucking point - this guy clearly can't make a livelihood posting videos on youtube anymore and he's crying like a bitch about it. Now Kotaku want's to make google out to be a bad guy because they won't host this guy's videos.
Dude, it's almost 2014! I never said the internet wasn't real world and that you can't have an internet related job. I just pointed out if this guy was good at what he does, somebody would pay him to do what he does. He was a freelancer getting paid to get hits on youtube, not to review games. Now that that's out…
Internet tough guy alert! I can tell from your posting history that you live a sad and lonely life. Keep your chin up man, someday things will turn around for you. Have a great holiday season and just remember: things do get better.
The way I read it is that youtube has a bot looking for material that copyright holders want down. They may not have specifically asked to take down a certain video but have told them to remove all offending videos. I'm sure Google has some of the biggest and best lawyers in the world involved in any kind of copyright…
I don't think that's how youtube works. youtube pays people based on the amount of hits. Advertisers pay youtube to put their ads before videos, no?
Youtube is just trying to protect themselves from these big name companies trying to sue youtube because they're hosting copyrighted videos. If they feel that a video is violating a copyright they don't have to check with the company first to see if they mind if the video is up or not
Well, if this guy is a "professional" critic like many of you are claiming then somebody will pay him for his talent. if not, then he's nothing but a youtuber
He obviously isn't good enough if he depends on youtube. The only reason people watch his videos is they're free. If he was a good professional critic somebody would pay him for being a critic.
Actually, youtube has the right to block whatever they want regardless of it's content
Most musicians and artists are shitty and don't make money. They should get a real job too instead of being fucking leeches. If he had real talent, youtube policies wouldn't be the end of him, he'd be able to use his talent to make money elsewhere.
The lesson here - don't quit your job to post videos on youtube.
That's none of your damn business and I'll thank you to stay out of my personal affairs
Still better then tom ley
No, he's right, you are the worst, and it's not just this blog post, it's all of them. You suck at writing and your not funny. I'm not trying to be mean, I'm trying to help you out dude. It's time to start looking into another line of work.
Hey Schreier you got Trettons pubes stuck in your teeth... again.
Killzone won't have dlc?
It's not censorship, it's a feature that can be turned on or off. Congratulations Barry, you've proven your both a shitty writer and a whiny bitch in one blog post
The Bears search for a DT continues...
The Bears search for a DT continues...
It can do surround sound. Did you read the article? It just can't do optical output headphones designed for last generation consoles