I agree when the rules are specific to behavior in-game but no way can you play the dumb card when fixing a match for money. I’m sorry officer I didn’t read the law that said I couldn’t kill someone.

One of the first thing he shows in the video.

Is it ridiculous? Absolutely. Am I drooling? Yes.

Haha I agree. I wish they had a real katamari game for PC.

I thought it was a blast. It was pretty surprising as a title. It’s clear it was part of laying the groundwork for all the mini games you can play in GTA. If they did a quick PC/XBONE/PS4 re-release with higher res textures and improved lighting effects I’d totally get it.

Killer Instinct is a XBONE title not a 360 title. Just saying.

Hell ya. Love Bayonetta.

Agreed!

Tetris DS is kinda hard to find but for me it was the best tetris experience. Nintendo knows how to do tetris. I even loved all the different modes they had in there, some were refreshing and always responsive.

Zero fucks

The only F2P I played for a while were Team Fortress 2 and Planetside 2 but how would charging to play a game change your odds of sticking with a game? Is it only because you paid money so you have financial obligations? For me a games quality is not linked to the fact that it is F2P or not. If you look at Titanfall,…

They aren’t all bad.

Running the game at native resolution and 60 FPS is not indicative of your PC’s strength. Unless you meant at MAX graphical settings. But I can just turn down a game to LOW and have 60 FPS if my computer is older. But graphical mods usually go above the maximum graphical setting. So running skyrim at 60fps on medium…

I don’t think they will have graphical mods. I could be wrong but it would be hard to implement. Crazy graphical mods on PC are made with the fact that the PC is very strong. You’re not gonna run Skyrim with a ton of graphical mods on a shitty computer.

That is content. New heroes is content in a MOBA game. Sometimes they will also add modes and maps. TF2 has tons of updates with tons of content.

The greedy aspect is them cashing in on their fans who will buy the game for 40$ and then the eventual F2P transfer.

As for adding a healthy streams of content, your comment about MMO makes no sense. All current F2P games have content added to them regularly, probably at a higher rate than any MMO ever had.

No of course they should make profit, but it’s shown that proper F2P models already makes a shit ton of money.

We will have to wait and see how the game is updated, but I feel like that amount of money to get everything will be on par with HON and Hearthstone except you will have already paid 40-60$ for the base game.

Dota 2 still has all content and balance for free so that’s 20$ less that the original Dota. How is that not better? I feel like it’s use of the F2P model is the right one.

I agree with you when it comes to the way games have cut content and bonuses/costume/secrets/cheats to make it DLC. Those adding microtransactions…

It is a guess, but a safe one in my opinion. Not saying it will happen a month after launch. Heck it won’t probably happen for 2 years or more but once the number of people that play goes down going F2P is typically the route studio’s go for. Blizzard has done this on both WOW and Starcraft 2.

They could always go the…

I’m not saying it’s not different, I’m saying it’s still a good example of a profitable F2P game and that the F2P model is what made it the success that it is. And LOL is the same in the way that the F2P model is what made it’s success. Idealy Blizzard would copy the model and make money on cosmetic and e-sport.