APissedAnt
APissedAnt
APissedAnt

No, actually... even people with similar ideologies hate Cruz. Plus he has those things in his tonsils that give him terrible breath- and he eats them.

No, no one wants to work with Ted. Not even Alito and Thomas.

I’m confused how he manages to have both a campaign and congressional staff. It truly boggles my mind.

People like entertainment. People pay attention to entertainment. People are now writing articles reminding everyone about VW’s dirty tricks. We’re now talking about the pollutants. It appears his trolling did an effective job of holding VW’s feet to the fire.

Greenpeace is trying more conventional protests. We’re all

You understand that 600,000 cars were spewing 40 times the legal limit of pollutants for 10 years, right? That doesn’t just magically go away with some bullshit pissant fine. Our kids are still breathing that shit in.

Lawrence O’Donnell is quite liberal and does good work. He has helped raise millions for charity on his program.

I agree... but would like to point out that MSNBC is owned by Comcast, yet Comcast did not offer MSNBC in their basic channel lineup, but does offer Fox News in their basic channel lineup.

I’m not paying an extra $30 a month for MSNBC.

It’s hard to compete with someone without suiting up and getting on the same field.

You proposed banning animals from the plane, and then used an analogy comparing it to handicap spaces. The obvious inference one would gather is that we should also remove handicap spaces. If this was not your intention, good I guess? But it might help to watch your wording in the future.

Everything gets abused no

Handicapped parking also has special, larger spots to allow the ramp or elevated platform to extend out from the vehicle so the person in the wheel chair can actually get out of the vehicle.

I was with you until you flipped out about handicapped parking being “abused” by the disabled. It’s 2 or 3 spots near the door-

To be able to lock Cruz, Trump, Kanye, and a few other random sociopaths in a room with video cameras. I’m pretty sure that was the idea of The Surreal Life, but they just used crazy people with addiction problems, not true sociopaths.

I assume that goes the same for the women he’s bedded- until the relationship ends and he shows that he thinks of them just like every other woman on earth.

Haha, it’s February in Connecticut. Between the deer ticks and the frozen tundra... I think I’ll have to find something else. ;)

I’m brewing cider, cooking tons of food, and fixing old electronics... it takes up SOME time.

I think celebrities are a bit different- we’ve already gotten an engrained image of who they are, the mugshot is shock value, not heavily influencing our opinion. With this kid, had they published his mugshot, that would be our initial view of him and would color our opinion of him from then on out.

Maybe you should

Holy shit I’m in that boat now! I spent 50+ hours a week working, and 15+ hours a week doing schoolwork. Now I’m laid off and I finished my degree... I’M SO FUCKING BORED. In my entire 34 years, I’ve never really had time not working, and I have no idea what to do with myself.

I always forget that the true definition of manhood, strength, and courage can only be met by being a draft dodging trust fund man-baby that has his “assistants” assault his opponents for him.

HIS xenophobia and hatred may or may not be sincere- that isn’t what the article is arguing: His followers’ xenophobia and hatred is most definitely real. As was written in another article quite recently, Donald Trump just replaced the dog whistle with a megaphone.

Is there a list of famous, married men that haven’t slept with the family nanny?

Have wives considering hiring gay men or old women?

This young hot nanny thing doesn’t seem to be working out for them.

I guess, either that or marry men that can keep their dicks in their pants- which brings me back to my first question: Do

You’re moving the goalposts and changing tons of shit here-
You stated the call must have been bad because they received a suspension.

I pointed out that this is circular reasoning because the main focus from the very title of this article was whether the referees were being suspended for making a bad call or series of


Seems the suspension of the officiating crew was a big part of the article.


You offered as evidence the statement, “you don’t get punished for a maybe.”

The clear implication is that the call must have been bad, otherwise they wouldn’t have been punished.

Since the debate was largely over whether they should have been punished, the fact they were punished cannot be used as evidence that they

He doesn’t have access to all the cameras. It doesn’t matter what you can obviously see on camera G if only cameras A, B, C, and D are available for review.

Beyond this, you’ve ignored all other arguments- DOES HE HAVE CONTROL OF THE BALL?

From SBnation:
“If Duke fans want to gripe, this is the part they should gripe

You’re saying the fact that they were suspended is the proof that it was a really bad call-
That’s circular reasoning.

I shall use your same logic and say the fact that the play was called as a touchdown proves that the call was correct.
That sounds dumb, right?

Because circular reasoning is always bad.

Two of the four