You can wing it. Star Wars movies are basically popcorn action flicks with a little romance and humor to make them something for everyone. They don't have to be an epic sci-fi experience unless you want them to be.
You can wing it. Star Wars movies are basically popcorn action flicks with a little romance and humor to make them something for everyone. They don't have to be an epic sci-fi experience unless you want them to be.
Where?
I really think the fees need to be mitigated. I understand the reason for them - it’s insurance for the bank. But in the modern world, “cash only” simply isn’t a practical idea anymore. If you want to do anything you need some sort of card. The very notion that you can't get up-to-date information about your balance…
I don’t know. I think there’s enough people out there who are singlemindedly looking to “win”. In a video game world there’s a certain amount of prestige to being the last one standing. It only takes one of those people to ruin the party for everyone who realizes the game ends when that happens.
Sparing lives only keeps the population up if new players keep paying. That’s the fatal flaw here. Being a $10 multiplayer-only game already limits the audience. Every single death in-game results in one less player, and they aren’t likely to be replaced. It’ll get whittled down to a few dozen, because every other…
I don’t play these sorts of games either, but every article I’ve read says the communities they attract are mean-spirited trolls who delight in torturing you and taking every measure they can to eliminate your progress before killing you. DayZ and Rust being the prime examples. No one on the internet is into kumbaya.
I could not think of a way to make less money on a multiplayer game, nor a more effective way for a player to get rid of $10 short of flushing it down the toilet.
The Emporer’s force lightning messed with his nerve endings and now he constantly feels chilly. He’s spent the last couple decades manipulating dice at the craps table to pay bounty hunters for warm taun-tauns to sleep in.
Yeah, as far as I know. I’ve never heard it used in relation to a fetus. Then again I also don't have any connection to people like Chrissy Teigen. It just seems like a weird word to use and I was wondering whether that's actually common nomenclature now. And if it is, how did that come about?
I’m not disputing that, but I think maybe you’re misinterpreting a headline or something. Urban dictionary doesn’t relate hubby to pregnancy. There’s plenty when you google it, but ithe top hits are all about the “hubby” interacting in some way with the mother-to-be - surprising him with the news, being surprised by…
I’m beginning to think that martyrdom sells almost as well as sex. The notion that you’re being oppressed is ironically empowering in a land of privileged people.
Marvel is taking a huge risk, but a smart one if the target demographic is what I think it is. The comic audience leans toward progressive: anti-establishment, focused on correcting social injustice, “not gonna take it anymore” kinds of issues. It also includes racial and ethnic diversity, as well as gender equality.
Think about it for a bit.
Considering they just defunded Planned Parenthood, I think this a monumentally bad idea. It will not be taken in the context you want.
For sensitivities' sake, please don't use that when there's actually someone in your uterus. "Stay out of my business" is classic and does just fine.
Hubby? How did that change? Hasn't that been "husband" for a couple centuries?
Not when they tweet about it. If she didn’t want the attention, she shouldn’t have posted a photo for the entire planet to look at. Privacy is still a thing, you just have to exercise the willpower to use it.
Still better than no one noticing.
I have an issue that she called it “the damn thing”. Vernacular needs to change come Mommy-time. Understood she’s frustrated by internet meanness, but an infant is WAY more frustrating in a totally different way.
Which ones?