996C2
996C2
996C2

You should have stopped at 'Dick' - because you are correct in that. From that point on your lack of knowledge on Canadian extradition law is showing.

This is only in exceptional cases. (Death sentence States)

He won't be. It's a ticket in Canada - no jail for what he did up here. Personally the cop's in New York over reacted and took it like a personal insult to go after him. Meanwhile REAL criminals are walking around car jacking people and don't get much more then 2 years in jail. Was the chief butt hurt over this and

Waiting for the next Ferrari road test. OK? Problem?

Just checked with my friend who has represented people for extradition and his response was that unless the charges carry a two year prison term AND there was involvement of violence or injuries to others; the chances that the Canadian Government would entertain an application are remote.

Scraping the klag off the tires is not the same thing. They actually are not allowed under the rules to alter the tires. Every tire gets returned to Pirelli at days end - they scan in each tire and get it back the next day or get a new one mounted instead. Everything is tracked and each team has a Pirelli tech

'ENORMOUS subsidies'

'There's a rumor that Audi is considering redirecting their LeMan/WEC money into buying an existing F1 team for 2016 since it doesn't make sense for VW to have two LeMans teams (Audi and Porsche).'

Eventually, but for a Porsche club magazine. It mainly has to do with one chassis in particular and the crazy way Porsche used to swap chassis serial number plates around. Separating fact from fiction - which chassis's were scraped and oh wait, now rebuilt and renumbered with a body from another chassis etc. An

Pretty hard to produce a lot of Beetles when the factory was only partly completed at the start of WW2 in Sept of 1939. In fact in mid 1940 the most of the sections of the plant were only just finished (except for the steel plant) and were now being rebuilt to produce the Kubelvagens, Schwimmwagen, and later the V1.

OK, so that would be a NO... Thanks.

Because we (Canada) have these stupid left lane 'parkers' who just sit there doing the speed limit and won't move over. Soooo.... that forces everyone else to pass on the right to get around them. If the cop's would uphold the law on failing to exit a passing lane we wouldn't have people getting pissed off an passing

Again - US centric... The OP wasn't parsing the sentence - he didn't include 'over land' in his question. You take his question one way - I take it another. I answered his question. You didn't answer mine. I'll repeat it. Can you show me a ban on any manufacturer from any country producing an aircraft that can exceed

Please read the comment I was replying to again - your picking a fight over something not said. The OP didn't mention the US at all. I didn't mention the US at all. His statement was why aren't civilian aircraft allowed to break the sound barrier. You introduce the FAA issues here and flights over US land mass, why?

That's not the same as a law stating you cannot BUILD a supersonic aircraft for the civilian market - just that if you do - you cannot break Mach 1 over US land surfaces - that is a FLIGHT restriction. The FAA has no jurisdiction over any other non US land masses.

This how fragile the 917 chassis were: (917L-041 test at the VW track) Driver walked away...

He's a fine gentleman. I have an email from him only last month on some research I am doing on a chassis.

Editor isn't working: Correct table for 962:

The 917:

'a 956 did race and win a Can Am race.'