959Hoonage
959Hoonage
959Hoonage

The narratives that have built up about Clinton being a terrible campaigner and Trump being a political genius are going to change now that we’re (almost)into the general election. She’s going to destroy him, and I’m going to love watching it.

Brilliant. Clinton is so much better than she’s given credit for. She’s intelligent, thoughtful, and experienced. She’s made mistakes, but so have we all. Plus, she’s learned from them, which unfortunately cannot be said for Trump.

6cyl probably would not fit and would throw the balance off quite a bit...but I don’t see how they could not tune this even in N/A form to 225-230 hp. Honda got 240 hp out of a 2.0L motor in 1999...this isn’t rocket science.

Why bother with facts ?

Except it’s not an M3 made for the Italian market. It may share an engine class with the M3, but there are many differences between an M3 and the standard chassis. Besides the sheet metal differences for better aero, the M3 had the 5 lug wheels and a different suspension geometry. (Mount points are the same though.)

I think most people here don’t understand what a 320is really is...

I’m skeptical of these things too but I think this is worth $10K. TT, manual and in decent shape makes it rare enough. I can’t factor the convertible top in. Wonder how cowl shake is?

I’m fine with Bernie staying in the race to accumulate votes and show Democrats that there is broad, national support for a progressive agenda. I am not alright with him staying in the race in a desperate bid to win.

Anybody feel better now?

“The stop is nice to have” said no one

Can I be that person? Because I’ll be kinda sad they’re giving up the extra advantage in the rain with this. I do love the wet-weather advantages of having extra weight over the drive wheels.

Not really seeing it in ALL its glory. Sure would be nice to see more than just the front end.

Can you get this done cheaper: yes.

Probably because the battery pack necessary to do that would weigh over 1000 pounds, making it impractical to design for when 95% of the time it isn’t being used. More realistically, you could add a small engine up front and use it to supplement travel for longer trips. Call the car a Volt or something.

This is not what HDR looks like.

like this

Presenting non-gaap numbers isn’t a ‘warning sign’ for a publicly traded company. GAAP is not perfect and many times it makes more sense to present the information in alternative ways. For example a huge non-cash charge or pickup required by gaap can throw off the comparisons when you’re trying to understand what

They do present the GAAP numbers, but apparently they’ve done a somewhat half-asses job of presenting the GAAP numbers more prominently and clearly distinguishing between the two.

They’re a domestic, publicly-traded corp., and therefore are bound by GAAP. IFRS would not be applicable to Tesla. They can present non-GAAP numbers, but they must state more prominently their GAAP numbers as well as an explanation of the difference between the two.

They are reporting their finances using non-GAAP accounting, which isn’t just odd for a car company its a warning sign for any publicly traded business. Additionally pure electric has a very low limit of potential customer base due to things like hilariously low energy density. Also its not all that good for the