Fool me once, shame on me.

@1st: Full self-driving in six months, maybe; sixty years, definitely.

It will be Level 3 at best...Elon and his stans will act like its Level 5 though.

My 80 Malibu was self-driving. If you floored it, the throttle would stick to the floor because of the floor mat, and it was common for the lock cylinder to fall out of the steering column when you hit a bump so that the steering wheel would lock into position.

1st gear:  Although I’m a Tesla fan, I’m not a fan of the ‘self driving’... UNLESS that it becomes good enough that I can LEGALLY take a nap in the back seat while the car drives me home.  Until that happens, I’m not interested.   Nor am I interested in paying $$$$$ to be part of a beta test. 

“Fool Self Driving”

Musk is about as believable as George R. R. Martin.

“I really have no idea what this means.”

According to Reuters, the Tesla chief hopes the software will finally be ready by the end of 2022.

Musk merged into PayPal and was forced out as CEO, and then bought into Tesla and sued to be declared one of the founders.  I’ll grant him the two others but it’s easy to found “what if?” companies when you’re already a billionaire.

True. And in so many categories!

The more I hear about the poorly-thought-out things he does, the more I think he’s just a dude whose lucked into a speculative fortune over space travel. Buying Twitter (of all things what the fvck?) for 44b$ seems completely irrational unless you’re some kind of drug addicted, drugged up truther, then it makes…

Soon Musk is just gonna take the problem of the declining birth rate into his own hands. He is going to start an *Earth colony” and everyone that can have his baby will. Every Musk child will go through a special Musk academy to learn about the world and most importantly Musk. 

Everything this man does is cringe

This is kind of where I’m at, too. I get completely overwhelmed by No Man’s Sky and Elite Dangerous, there’s just too much out there. Having something smaller and more focused seems like the right thing for me.

As somebody who has played both No Man’s Sky and Elite Dangerous, those games are way, way too big, shallow and repetitive. I actually think 100 systems is ok. It’s big enough to feel open but still small enough that everything isn’t going to just repeat every 8 planets. Really looking forward to this, as I loathe…

Most of Skyrim’s many caves or dungeons were not very interesting barring a specific piece of loot you could find there (e.g. hunting down skill books) or a quest linked to it. There were endless procedural quests in the game but I don’t know if anyone enjoyed them beyond “it’s something to do and I like being in this…

This opinion might somehow seem unpopular, but I have faith in my peeps at BGS. Particularly in Rockville, and particularly in the single player experience.

little in yesterday’s presentation made me feel like Starfield’s 1,000 worlds would primarily exist to explore character motivations and moral dilemmas rather than to get me a better upgrade for my gun or ship.

I’ve finally been playing through Breath of the Wild and I’ve come to the conclusion that a “bigger, more explorable world” isn’t always better. I’d much rather go onto a smaller world that is more densely populated with interesting shit rather than huge giant worlds that take real world hours to explore, only to find…