That Daily Beast article was so slut-shamey and victim-blamey that any relevant or important information it might have included is lost on me. I had no opinion before (mostly because I, as a random person who has no insider information, don't really have a right to weigh in and I don't get why everyone thinks they do)…

And you consistently miss that because mental illness is so stimatized, people struggling with it often self medicate.

To say your sister's death is stupid is not the same thing as saying that she was stupid.

This is the reason I made a distinction between those who have the freedom to choose their projects and those who don't have the freedom to choose who they work for. There is a big fucking difference between being Scarlett Johansson with limitless possibilities for what roles she can take, and a broke 19-year-old…

My own case was looked into when I was a child, and plenty of people found reason to disbelieve and discredit it. You have to be extremely careful when you "add an aspect of the history to the news story" when it echoes a larger public narrative that's overwhelmingly sympathetic to Woody Allen. Frankly, I do think it…

Yes, yes, yes. Thank you for this. Dylan's story is extremely similar to my own, and it makes me feel sick to see so many commenters saying "now, now, we don't know for sure; innocent until proven guilty" as though this is a court case. Especially since abusers tend to be very, very, very good at coming across as…

It's Luna and Neville

"Devil's advocate isn't necessary in every situation. It would be nice if the molested child had more advocates. This is why victims don't speak out."

The parts of his personal life that he admits to proudly are profoundly disturbing. That there are worse parts he won't admit to is not surprising to me. I make it a point every time someone mentions Woody Allen to bring up his marriage; the rationalization from people I view as smart and empathetic is so upsetting.…

Why would you do that to a rotisserie chicken? Rotisserie chicken doesn't deserve that!

In what godforsaken world do chicken breasts come in a can? Why would you eat a dip that requires you to first obtain chicken-spam?

Buffalo Chicken Dip originated with the same brain trust that mixes up prepackaged 'thin-sliced corned beef ' with 'swiss cheese food' and sauerkraut in a goddamned crock pot and calls that shit 'reuben dip'.

Or just order some Buffalo wings, because you aren't a communist.

A) anarchy

What I really don't understand here is how a dip that basically none of us have ever heard of, let alone eaten:

Come on America, salsa v. guac is the matchup we need and deserve. Or maybe we deserve buffalo chicken dip, beside it's awful and we're awful.

There's a lot of items on there Mexicans wouldn't claim as their own: hard shell tacos, nachos, flour tortillas, etc.. For me the "douse it in ranchero sauce then carpet bomb it with shredded cheese" IS Tex-Mex. Most Mexican people don't cook that way, as I understand it.

This is unconscionable. Guy Fieri probably wouldn't eat Buffalo chicken dip.

FUCK ALL OF YOU! 99.9% of voters of Buffalo Chik dip have never even eaten it. Stop pulling your pud on the idea of that dip and do the right thing for once and vote for Salsa. You are the reason we can't have nice things anymore.

All Queso, all the time. Don't fuck this up!