Neutral: Would you ever buy a car without a steering wheel? Why? Why not?

I would love a self driving car for commuting, and a traditional driving car for enjoyment. I hate driving down a straight stretch of highway having idiots speed up when I try to pass, flashing their blinkers when I merge five car lengths in front of them, and people getting distracted slowing down to 55 in a 65. I…

This is one thing I've liked about the 360 since the beginning. I hope the PS4 has this.

Thank god, some of the most pig disgusting vehicles ever.

As ugly as the Aztek is, it looks more like something that would be produced today - especially when looking at things like the new Escape and other crossovers.

It'll be interesting to see how much some of these are CPO in a year or so. But it has one of the most powerful 4 cylinders ever - I don't think you can really compare it to a 335i.

Agreed. The marketing and bungie's attitude tries really hard to make this seem like the second coming but it looks like another solid shooter. Right now I'm wondering how Bungie took 4 years to make this. I'm still probably going to buy it and hope they can blow me away, but I'm not really feeling it.

Stiff animation, minimal on screen enemies, static environments with gussied up particle effects and shaders != next gen.

You really are this retarded. Bravo.

Uncompressed audio and including like 9 different languages. This accounts for probably a good 1/5th-1/10th the size.

Shit theory because there's no lithium in Meth and likely not used in any agents to make it.

Needing an expanded universe to fully appreciate the game's story highlights how poorly told Halo's narrative is. Great plot, shitty execution.

The game is probably the best of the generation, but this thread is about the technical limitations. I'm truly sorry that acknowledging abject reality hurts your feelings.

No, I'm referring to modern rendering capabilities and effects. Likewise, things like rendering cars further out then a hundred yards or so could be done with more RAM and better video processing. A game the same size as GTAV could have more detail, better image quality, and a more playable framerate. The hardware is…

Yeah the game looks great running on 8-year old tech. But the framerate and aliasing are shit by modern standards. That's why we need new tech, this game showcases the limits of current technology.

It's a fun little casual game with pretty good mechanics and i's fairly innovative. Yes, I know other games have done the 'knock down towers' thing but Angry Birds has a decent gimmick with special abilities.

I assume the show will pick up right where the cold open to 5B left off after the "Hello, Carol" thing. Then it'll be ~53 minutes of Walt exacting revenge on Grey Matter, The Nazis, Lydia, and Jesse in some way.

I was expecting it, but it's frustrating. I would like to have nice AS, AA, and a solid 1080p experience with a consistent framerate. The game is technically impressive but serves to highlight the limitations of the current gen consoles and is the best demonstration of why we need new hardware.

I'm not that interested in replaying the game on next-gen systems. I'd probably double dip for PC because of mods, but I'd much rather see a polished up psuedo-sequel. Something taking place in Los Santos (maybe add another island and city) and with a new story would be more appealing.

I don't think you'd need more than a GTX 760 to run this.