The console tech is nearly the same, it's not apples to oranges. The only difference is the raw processing power (of which the PS4 has a lot more) and RAM configuration.

Except it didn't. The 360 had a better performing GPU on paper, and first party titles that actually push the respective tech are very comparable (Halo 4 vs. Uncharted 3, for instance).

Also, since the GPU and CPU architecture is similar this round, you will see a difference.

I've already got a nice PC. It still won't play Killzone, Naughty Dog games or Halo.

No, not even depending on measures of performance. That bandwidth is for a small portion of RAM, maybe enough for the framebuffer. The GPU is still 50% short on compute units. Neat little tricks with the RAM won't mean shit in the face of raw power. I will likely end up with both systems, especially if Sunset…

But the PS4 has the superior tech, like in real mathematical terms. It's a fact. Unless we're talking gimmicky cameras.

Oh no, boobs and the female form. Boo hoo.

You are not entitled to quality. You're entitled to a product that does generally what it says. That's what you got, so stop whining. There's also a difference between "This game sucks" and "I DEMAND A NEW ENDING", the latter of which is exactly the kind of entitlement that is undeserved and makes gamers look like a…

You're here to spend money and *hopefully* get a decent piece of fiction. Mass effect was never hard sci-fi - I don't know what's wrong with you people. You invest time in something because it's entertaining, not because you expect some payoff. Deserving something above what you paid for (you bought a game, you got…

It's in line with the gauges over the steering wheel which is supposedly safer. Making it look tacked-on also saves plastic and bulk.

The texture resolution here is barely up to current-gen standards.

I'm going to get the graphics whoring statements out of the way. This game hardly looks next-gen.

Good question. I'm not sure how updates will work on the PS4, I was under the impression that background or auto-updates could happen without PS+ on it.

The problem is the restrictions it imposes on the property rights of disc-based stuff. I think if MS wants to take gaming digitally, they should offer incentives for digital purchases. Family sharing ought to work for digital purchases, but not for disc-based games for instance. MS won't do this, but nothing is…

It wasn't even slated for launch. Also, nothing assured that you could play the same game at the same time.

"Nobody wins E3"

It's a press event in a competitive market. If you get the best press, you win. Why is this so hard to understand?

Well, yeah, naturally. People like to own the things they buy.

I'm saying that the cut in margin for the retailer (e.g., GameStop) is made up for by increasing the price. The consumer pays, I agree with you.

I love this. "No fees" but the publisher may be getting a percentage of resold games. I wonder who that cut in margin will be passed on to...

I found Postal and Rampage to be pretty entertaining in a sick "leave your morals at the door" kind of way. They're actually decently made films.

This still doesn't imply that his pay is anything bad. They cut the studios because they saw they weren't going to be returning adequate (or any) profit. I see no problem here. You don't just keep dead weight because it's the nice thing to do.