You are very small minded. This incentive is supposed to drive innovation and move our transportation system forward.
You are very small minded. This incentive is supposed to drive innovation and move our transportation system forward.
As long as we also end corn subsidies, funding to the Middle East to stabilize oil production, and tax breaks for oil companies I’m ok with this too.
If I found that spot, I’d take cabs for a week just to keep it.
Yep. The primates that didn’t eat meat are still there.
Whatever works for you.
“Cows” and “ecologically responsible” do not belong in the same comment. If people actually cared about the environment, they wouldn’t eat meat (or buy leather for that matter).
The bottom line is we don’t need to eat animals or wear and cover our seats with their skins. We do need to evolve past the habits of cavemen not just in terms of kindness and sustainability but also to realize our true potential as human beings and beyond. In other words we need to develop a greater sensitivity to…
And 4runner is only sold in america. The rest of the world gets, Land Cruiser, Land Cruiser Prado (used in this video and Lexus GX460 in america) and FJs.
Whatever law it is that allows GM to use reverse indicators as approach/departure lighting. That one is the stupidest.
This remind me of the folks that shop at Wal Mart with their UI checks after Wal Mart forced their suppliers to start producing in China.
I bought an off-lease iMiEV for absolute peanuts and plan on commuting in it until one of us stops moving forward (probably me.)
Yes, and just got done watching the pickuptrucks.com video on chevy’s custom zr2 service bodied recovery truck where they put a 1" lift and 33's on it to make it more capable off road http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2017/05/video-gm-customizes-2017-chevrolet-colorado-zr2-as-chase-vehicle.html
What a shitpost. Companies are finally acknowledging they don’t need to kill millions of animals to sell a vehicle, they should be getting all the support. Leather is a garbage material as it is, so they should be applauded for using better materials regardless.
It should really be Utah Will Still Have Less Harsh Anti-Drunk Driving Laws than Pretty Much Every Other Country on Earth, Starting December 30th, 2018.
Source
I agree that it’s oversimplified. Just clickbait isn’t really the right answer to that. “Gotta get those clicks” kind of implies that it was a deliberate choice that would get more views than the alternative. Was that the intent or is it more of a they don’t put effort in because they’re rushing implication?