Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    5mt
    jj
    5mt

    Laws should reflect societies value and beliefs.

    The real person to blame for the danger is the government. It is perfectly understandable to follow the speed limit; some people cannot risk the repercussions of being ticketed. It is also perfectly understandable to keep up with the flow of traffic; some people cannot afford to be in a car accident, and may see not

    On some of the less central main streets in Toronto, the driving speed is about 20km/h over the speed limit.

    If it were RWD, it would be awesome.
    It isn't, and as a result, it fucking sucks.

    I personally would like to see a Lotus Sport Sedan.

    Would take M135I over just about anything and everything - Would sell a kidney for a Canada spec one.

    I don't see any Altezza tail lights - and I'm pretty sure I would recognize them, as I drive a rebadged Altezza.

    One more thing:

    This. I'm not a great drifter/driver/ whatever, but, I've drifted my IS300 on 6 plus inches of snow, in a parking lot with a lot more poles/SQ FT than this one, and I managed to avoid hitting any poles. It Isn't hard; when drifting on snow, know the location of every obstacle, and do not perform a manoeuvre which

    This is actually a beautiful scenario, and here is why:

    My personal hypothesis regarding the enforcement of low level moving violations, and low level arrests, is that they don't have any tangible benefit on society.

    Am I the only that likes the Teslas interior?

    If when you typed this you figured that everyone who read your post would understand what you are trying to say, I'm sorry sir, but you were deeply mistaken. As a matter of fact, if that was the case, I suggest you visit the doctors.

    As someone who just bought a RWD, and made sacrifices in order to do so, I would say the reason is RWD allows you to have more fun, and especially, more legal fun.

    S600, SL600, or CL600 with equal length long tube headers.

    But, on the car in question you can add a 4 year warranty for a mere 2000 dollars.

    The real reason the 63 sucks is because its the not the 65.

    What is demonstrated in this video is the difference between a good snow car, and a fun snow car.

    I'd rather have an E46

    Could someone please tell me how to find the prices for the warranties. Please, I really need to know how much they are going to charge to warranty this: http://www.carmax.com/enus/view-car/…

    While Honda might propose that in real world situations this isn't a problem, I think I now know why people who have chalets in the mountains of Colorado drive Subarus, Chevy's and Audis, and not Hondas.