She seemed calmer and clearer than at least one of the airport personnel in the exchange, who mistakenly said the wrong runway designation (“27 right” instead of the correct “27 left” — she had to ask which it was after he said both). He also seemed to miss her early statement that there were injured passengers aboard…

I believe Putin’s Russians aren’t the only ones who seek and wield Kompromat as a powerful control over their targets. There’s a reason besides inherent sleaze why so many Trumpite politicians (and others in powerful positions) turn out to have dirty secrets. They’re usually cheaper than bribes and often work better…

Yeah, whatever it is, it’s less clean than “hire.”

...or it could involve being offered real estate at far below market value in return for propaganda services rendered. Just real estate advice from a buddy, no big deal.

Ah, but dumb enough to hire Cohen to help him do money laundering? Would add another dimension of rock-dumb stupidity, thus is plausible and would also explain his especially rabid attacks on the Cohen case. Otherwise it’s just another NDA for a secret sex partner/victim. Or both?

Plus, Hannity says it involved “real estate.” Money laundering via overpriced real estate is a classic. Just ask Trump. Or Cohen.

So Cohen named Hannity as a “client” when forced to out his mystery third client. Just three official Cohen clients then, one of whom is Trump and the second of whom is Broidy. That so does not fit with what Hannity is claiming:

Makes no sense to put your credit cards in that case. It’s for protecting the phone and maybe carrying a couple of $20 bills and some business cards or a bus pass.

I don’t wish to be number one anymore...

Yes, Comey is a sanctimonious showboater, while Mueller knuckles down and goes for the goal without tripping over his own ego. I believe what Comey writes about Trump, but thank goodness Mueller is directing the investigation.

Why would they expect him to stop what he started and built and is committed to? Ah, I see. The Seahawks suits don’t comprehend an actual principled stand. They assumed he’d cave for the money and perks. Says a lot about them.

No. Humor and adventure need good writing and a coherent story too.

It continues to be a mystery to me how many movie industry corporate suits cannot see that a good story and good writing are important to audience reception and ultimately the bottom line. Should be simple, but no. Their only consideration is

Yes, Ms Vitter is a true screaming horror. Here’s a link for any wanting more info on this latest of catastrophic Trump regime judicial nominees: https://theslot.jezebel.com/trumps-latest-judicial-nominee-once-promoted-literature-1825172745

BTW, if you’re a Prime member, you can currently choose standard shipping instead of the two-day option on any order and you will get $1 off digital media (ebooks video) each time. This is one of a rotation selection of slow-shipping premiums and returns from time to time.

BTW, if you’re a Prime member, you can currently choose standard shipping instead of the two-day option on any order…

As I interpret this, he’s not putting BP down in any way, he’s saying there is ALSO a need for diverse representation in movies and tv showing regular people in more ordinary, real-life roles. If so, I agree. An example of what is needed: the New York based series Elementary, a Sherlock Holmes take in which roles…

If they are scaled like the cowboy-themed one, that looks way too heavy for a young child. Not only too big but also heavy materials. The heaviest part of bookbag contents was multiple hardbound textbooks when I was a kid. Can’t this be done better — and with far less deadweight — digitally now? I think this…

Congress has allowed the President to accrue the powers of a dictator, including the power to declare war, which is specifically unconstitutional. Congress is supposed to control with laws and by controlling the purse strings. Now we have an insane, capricious monster who believes he has all powers and that Congress…

I hope that the fact that he actually fought against installing sprinklers can be grounds for a lawsuit by the victim’s family, despite the technical legality of his building being grandfathered. After all, the sprinkler requirement came after horrific deaths of firemen in the absence of sprinklers, and Trump’s stated…

There were no sprinklers on the floor, which surely made the fire worse, and a person has died. http://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/dies-trump-tower-unsafe/9283/