It absolutely would’ve been a “seismic shock” if Trae Young had won.

Just to be clear, the adults have been bringing children because it gets them preferential treatment.

There were several comments pushing top 5 that were all removed. Nothing was spoken ill, they were just pointing out the writer had left out very viable information.

So the Holocaust Museum is now required to follow DNC talking points?

Seem that y’all aren’t interested in any comments today.

Any comment that goes against the narrative of the blog will be deleted.

We all know the true definition of concentration camp.  We all also know what most people associate concentration camps with.  We all know the reason AOC used the term concentration camp was to draw a comparison of Trump to Hitler.  We all know that what is going on at the border is nothing like what happened in…

Let’s tap the brakes on the use of “reporter” in this particular circumstance.

“status as a blogger for Deadspin probably doesn’t warrant a response”

If my co workers were in a salary litigation I wouldn’t comment either. Also, did you consider your status as a blogger for Deadspin probably doesn’t warrant a response?

If my employer was being sued and a reporter asked me to comment on the thing the lawsuit was about I’d probably avoid talking about it too.

This should be criticism. It was not even addressed in the story. Nor was there any discussion about the nuances about the situation. 

A mother and 3 children attempt to break US law and die in the process.

This article is making some assumptive leaps that you don’t find in the New York Times article; mainly creating the sense of a correlation between their deaths and accusations of border patrol agents maliciously sabotaging life-saving water supplies.

Why no mention of Mexico’s horrific immigration policy?

About as many as Obama did when websites like Splinter’s predecessor weren’t reporting on it.

“Oh, and the gender discrimination lawsuit they filed against U.S. Soccer...”

Have you checked to see if they’re legally barred from discussing the issue while the lawsuit is ongoing? This isn’t a criticism, I’m legitimately curious.

I’m really struggling to understand what you’re talking about in relation of the officiating here. It sounds like the correct decision was made each time? So how can you think that cameroon deserved the win here?