I was talking about what is an absolutely trivial aspect of GG that simply relates to an issue I have with this review. That “event” was comprised of far more important issues and problems than discussions about objectivity in gaming. And anyways, it isn’t even limited to GG; you see claims of objectivity or the lack…

It is used rather narrowly, in this case, or else I’d be engaging in masochism.

The creators are partly to blame for this analysis. They’ve frequently moralized and that’s resulted in people searching for the “meaning” in every episode. I get people instinctively want to understand media/note the patterns/interpret it, all that jazz.

The word “objective” needs to be officially retired. When the whole gamerdipshittery debacle was underway, all you heard from the morons was “critics should strive for objective reviews!!” Then critics and lefty types rightfully pointed out that no one is or should aim to be objective when criticizing media...then a…

They were minor when it came to the actual substance of his comment, and only needed a simple corrective reply, nothing inflammatory that subtracts from his main concerns and argument.

You’re totally right about the original post erroneously suggesting Kotaku is somehow in league with Bethesda, but that was a minor detail in his overall post. The majority of the time he focused on the technical issues with the engine, not whether Kotaku is kissing up to Bethesda; so to attack him and frame the whole…

MMOs suck asshole and people are gradually realizing that and the fact they are too expensive.

The vast majority of players don’t get crashes? Huh? How the fuck do you know that?

I’m not a republican, conservative, or remotely on the right? The whole post was about how the creators of the show are republicans (http://en.protothema.gr/south-parks-trey-parker-matt-stone-come-out-as-republicans-to-a-room-full-of-hollywood-elites/) and that the liberal audience of this show is in denial of that…

Since you’re not exactly acting like a human with empathy maybe you should join Mr. Polanski and die in obscurity with him.

This is genuinely one of the most moronic things I’ve ever read.

Who’s this “they”? The characters on the show? They’re not exactly reliable conduits for the creators’ thought in every episode, especially in ones like this. Or are you saying Matt and Trey said something?

Uhh, you’re right. I went to an impoverished wizarding school and the shitty teachers didn’t do a good job with the invocations.

“Holy shit, Ms. Rowling. Could you just answer-”

There isn’t a God, sadly. Satan exists, though. He created all of existence to entice us with pleasant reality before we’re hurtled into Hell. His little scheme makes eventual damnation all the more depressing.

*ACCEPT ITS CLIMATIC ECSTASY

Evictus Misgonists

Herzog voice:

The creators do generally try to show how complicated situations such as the one depicted in the episode can be for everyone involved. I won’t deny “The Problem with a Poo” begins, follows, and ends on a note of ambiguity. My issue though is the lens people are actually adopting when looking at the show. People have…

He shouldn’t have been run out of town. Is it far they cancelled his Christmas event? Absolutely. But kicking him out of town was ridiculous on their parts.