“You’re trying to avoid the clear issue where women don’t want to be sexual objects for men’s desires any longer. I’m pretty sure this has been going on for centuries but it’s just now gaining traction that we can get what we want. You can still be the guy who looks up movie sex scenes on porn hub. I’m just saying…

Tarintino has a ton of foot fetish shots in his films, and Kill Bill is filled with some that don’t even involve Thurman. In the scene where the 5.6.7.8's perform, they singer is dancing around in her bare feet. Plenty of shots of covered feet too by other actresses.

I mean, ehh.

For me, Jar Jar was never really a problem. He’s kinda annoying, but he doesn’t irk me the way he seems to for most others. I also don’t mind Jake Lloyd, and I always felt bad for him after he was done with Star Wars, making me more considerate of his performance in Episode 1. I do agree the slapstick stuff is bad,…

For me, AotC looks like a Pixar movie with the occasional real person appearing on the screen (uncanny valley in full effect).

Mcdiarmid was the only one on the cast who could work the dialogue into something worthwhile, though he a serious actor/director for theater (Shakespeare).

Do you know if he beat his wife? Please read about the case a bit, it would do you good.

So wouldn’t Oldman be a victim of abuse since his wife inflicted “psychological and emotional” abuse on him? Which claim of abuse do you prioritize?

Except, Oldman’s not a wife beater. His wife accused him of hitting her with a telephone receiver in from of their two children during a divorce. He ended up getting sole custody of the two kids. She’s supposedly an addict who inflicted “psychological and emotional” abuse on Oldman.

“It’s not that hard to discern if someone is uncomfortable.”

He asked her for consent multiple times about different advances. She denied him consent for the penetrative sex, and he stopped.

She was referring to the advances he was making specifically about sex when she indicated to him she didn’t want what was happening.

By clear communication I mean directly consenting or not consenting to a sexual advance. I don’t mean “cues” which aren’t direct because they can be easily misread and misunderstood.

Where in the article did she indicate that she didn’t consent (directly, with cues, or non-verbal cues) to his weird finger move? Now you can reverse that and say “where did she consent to his finger move” and you would be right, but all either of these two questions do is indicate that we have a lack of details about…

I know.

I said he stopped to the things he was asking her to do (sex). Nowhere in the article did it say that she wanted him to stop with his other activities. Had she said she wanted him to stop with the other advances (the fingers in the mouth thing, for example), I would have agreed that what he did was assault.

Fair in some ways. Still, we aren’t actually told what activity she was exactly walking away from. Was it just his presence or advances he was making?

You could clearly read the article and see that penetrative sex was the problem (when it came to consent, I never referred to it as the sole problem she had with him as you can see in my comment). Whenever he indicated that he wanted to “fuck her” is when she denied consent (with cues or directly). She described…

No, not really.

In what way was Aziz’s behavior coercive?