I admittedly got invested in the main storyline of the games (and the character that connects them all, Flemeth). The drastic differences in the games has really left a sour taste in my mouth for the series now and movie forward. I can understand why people like the games as standalone titles, but I simply am…
3dimensionallychallenged
3dimensionallychallenged
The issue for me with the art style between all three games is that there is no consistency. The change in gameplay, art style, and massive additions (and overhauls) to the lore makes each game in the series feel so disconnected. It’s less of a problem game to game and a larger issue for the series and honestly it…
I legitimately think the game would be a far better experience if players either just ignored the vast majority of Inquisitions’ content or if Bioware just flat out never included it in the game. I don’t particularly like the story of the game, but wholly crap is that the least of the game’s problems (which is amazing…
It’ss not like this series wasn’t a mess anyways. At least you could say that Mass Effect improved as the series went on with the exception of Andromeda. Dragon Age started off a slower paced arpg, then morphed into a frenetic rpg, then became some where mix of the two in a more open-world akin environment. The art…
I think the goal of most people in life is to live comfortably, not necessarily to make as much money as possible.
So ignore the other bits of my argument where I refute what you are saying, particularly when I bring up game development for the 360 and PS3.
No. my original comment is in response to what you were saying about businesses’ goal of “making as much money as possible.” That, by definition, is greed.
The idea with me bringing up previous console game releases is that games DON’T have to add micro transactions for a decent revenue stream. Heck, the 360 and PS3 for the first 5ish years didn’t really need micro transactions either and debts still got on fine, albeit with stupid overpriced map packs and the like.
“having or showing an intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth or power”
Actually, people expect them to officially release their game before they start introducing microtransactions, but you should just keep doing you and twist people’s arguments.
The devs have a revenue stream: the MILLIONS OF COPIES THEIR EARLY ACCESS GAME IS SELLING. Heck, triple AAA games sometimes don’t even push as many copies as this game has and they have massive development and marketing budgets, and I doubt that this game deals with the latter of those two all that much since it’s in…
Sure, that’s what people who are anti-microtransactions are saying; we want non-profit corporations.
How about developers, if they want to keep paying their employees, just make new games instead of adding microtransactions (especially lootboxes)?
First of all, the developers haven’t stopped making money; their game is STILL selling quite a ton of copies as we speak, and isn’t even officially released yet on PC. Also, they are likely planning a console release, bring their game to an even bigger install base.
Maybe the developers should wait until their game is officially released before they start selling microtransactions. Also, they haven’t stopped making money, their early access game is still selling quite well with or without stupid crates.
Yeah, ugly>asshole any day of the week. John loves some nose candy and drama (though he has been doing better there), pretty much on par with the other HouseHusbands of of Bravo.
Luann is what we in the biz call “a massive fucking hypocrite.” Trash when she wants to be, Classy Countess when she needs to be. Meanwhile, everyone else is up to the weird standards she has to be considered truly “classy.”
Maybe John is the least attractive of all the housewive partners but the Joes from Jersey are fucking assholes; they are leagues worse than most of the other husbands. Poison Joe is allegedly abusive, and Prison Joe is such a fucking douce that he makes his wife look good.