Of course they would. I have 4 different brands and have never been refused a fill anywhere.
Of course they would. I have 4 different brands and have never been refused a fill anywhere.
Of course they would. I have 4 different brands and have never been refused a fill anywhere.
Of course they would. I have 4 different brands and have never been refused a fill anywhere.
I wouldn’t climb up stairs to reach the middle of a building during a tornado though. Basement yes.
Blue
No. If the door is opened, it goes into park. Then you have to just shift it to what you want. It adds a step to the process, but fully confirms that you want to do what you’re attempting to do.
And a standard to prevent those other morons that drive at night using fog lamps, but no headlights just because it “looks cool.”
If you’re spinning, your tires are already unloaded from where they’d be at max traction.
Maybe, but I just can’t fathom them looking to save that little of weight in something as important as braking will be to slow this beast down. If I were in the market for this car, I’d be disappointed if it had less braking capability (or even less visual braking capability) than a lesser-powered car relative.
Did research and looks now to be the case. The ‘12 392 SRT brakes sitting next to my 12' CTS-V brakes (4 vs 6 pot) looked tiny in comparison. I guess they now both the 392 and Hellcat appear to use the same 6 pot. However, the picture still looks too small to be 6-pot calipers to me.
Nah. I can’t imagine giving it more power yet reducing braking capability, even with a weight reduction. A couple hundred pounds off of a 4500 lb vehicle isn’t much.
Brakes look too small to me. They look to be off of the normal SRT vs the larger Hellcat brakes.
I’m sure there’s smart people already making big money short selling stocks based upon his company bashing tweets.
Typo: You mention having to keep your brace leg up while going counterclockwise. I think that you’re meaning clockwise at that point. Correct?
Great article.
Front. Unless you own a cat. Then back so the stooopid cat doesn't unravel it all.
Maybe. Maybe I'll be able to identify the series.
Jumped out at me too. Replace "farther" with "less than" and it works. Video shows that clearly being the case.
And that's why he used 14 phrases for his calculation and not 60 words.
Are you sure they're going straight to a Turbo S and this is not just the Turbo?
You nailed it with this one. I have another similar gripe... People who purposely only turn on their marker lights and use their fog lights instead of headlights. Do they think it looks cool? Are they trying to "save" their headlights??
I have a 12 CTS-V with 556 hp. I also have a few bikes; the newest being a 16 Yamaha R1 with about 180 hp to the wheel and is an absolute rocket. So with that in mind, I'm thinking that "more" is the hp needed on the CTS-V.