Poor analogy. Enjoying something is not science (and right or wrong based on facts). Sure, a different transmission option will get me better mileage (or get me into gear slightly faster), but I can also get better mileage from a smaller engine, over-inflating my tires, not accelerating ever, not using air…

I thought elmo was responsible for doing the rear-ending?

I thought that a good number of minivans had AWD available?

This was my first thought.

actually, he drives something way different.

Fact. I don't understand why people have so much minivan hate. They're amazing at what they do.

I agree. He's shooting from a funny angle though -he's lower than you usually see, I'm not sure how much of the oddness that is responsible for.

it was after the hint....

How much more does this weigh? Just curious since 160hp doesn't sound like a lot, and supposedly enough the Abarth has enough power to not feel too slow.

I think that's the point. He wants the performance but doesn't care if anyone else can see that he has it.

That was really interesting and enlightening. Thanks!

yes, yes I did.

Umm.... I see a picture of Andy Reid. You sure have a funny definition of "playmate"

Given that sponsorships are critical to a driver how important are politics to a driver's career? If you assume some level of driving skill, how much effort is devoted to seeking sponsors and how much is devoted to driving? 20%? 50%?

that one is actually slightly downhill.

they're at most targets and other stores too: http://www.prankpack.com/retail-locations

don't forget patented...

What are the best and worst cars y'all have driven in the snow?

Milkshake as in milkshake or milkshake as in Beyonce's "milkshake." I'm pretty sure only one of them will help resolve a conflict...

Doesn't it take about that long for a big organization to make the business decision to make the change, rationalize/get appropriate buy-in of it, and get everything up to spec for a different market?