I suppose for a marketing perspective this is a smart move for Honda. A lot of people fart-can-up Civics anyway and this model already comes pre-prepared as a ready to drive fartcanmobile. Probably much cheaper than doing the odd yourself.

I've never used the term "Disgusting looking" when it comes to cars. But the front end of this thing looks pretty disgusting. Like the mouth of a crab or something.

these still look like pontiacs with lots if chrome stuck on the front and rear. I dislike cars like these where they took the name of a once glorious brand which at one time made beautiful cars of their own and instead made tacky replicas or expensive kit cars from existing pedestrian cars like the one above.

Those engines used a shit ton of oil too. I went to an air show one time to see a showcase of flying WW2 bomber planes and ALL of them had big coffee cans hanging under the engines as oil constantly dripped out of them.

yuck!

yuck!

Sorry but even when these were new I felt they were the most bland, boring looking cars. There's something very "econocar" looking about the overall design.

Basically Hughes was in hot water because the government was accusing him of squandering money on the plane so getting it off the ground period was more or less to prove that the thing would "fly". The war was over then and there wasn't a need for the plane. Plus the thing was just impractically large. The question…

The Spruce Goose was and is amazing. Its made almost entirely out of birch veneer strips which were heated and compressed together with epoxy. Tests showed that it was more durable and stronger than aluminum. This was used mainly because the military wouldn't allow aluminum to be used for the prototype due to war…

CP. That said these were pretty fast cars in their day. If it didn't have the stupid wheels and hadn't been used as a drift car if say 5k.

let us know if the window cranks break , the transmission poops out or if you get lots of random electrical problems.

yes. Hence why I made the joke.

Usually most supercars look about the same to me. Big wedges on wheels. This one on the other hand looks rather nice. I especially like the driver's seat area.

The picture made me think that this was a sarcastic joke: oh lookie.... same SUV, different model names

Ha ha! Stupid Llamas...

Always insane to see something like this given that the amount of planes here is many times larger than most any other country's active fleet.

There are still many brands in the US that the rest of the world hardly sees with the exception of maybe China. Brands like Buick, Cadillac, A good part of the Chrysler lineup, and then not to mention the ENTIRE full-size truck category. The US is still pretty different in terms of its cars and trucks. So it will be a…

nothing "bad ass" about it. As someone who works on electronics the pictures shown here makes me cringe.

Audi among other luxury brands are getting too conservative with their designs. Then again they sell so why mess with a formula. To me the entire Audi lineup looks like the same car over and over again and to some degree so too do the models from BMW, Mercedes, and even Cadillac .

So is it actually the heaviest place or simply makes a larger footprint? Big difference there.

I feel the same. More or less because just like Volvo, at one time Subaru sort of "did their own thing" making interesting and sometimes outright bizarre, original cars to cars that look more in keeping with your typical family sedan. Yet they've clearly discovered the formula, which is probably closer to what Toyota…