125968
starkhuh
125968

A thousand apologies my friend!

A wise man once said it doesn’t matter if you win by an inch or a mile, a win is a win.

Does Gillbrand have a former President for a husband whose advice to campaign in Michigan and Wisconsin she ignored?

I want to believe, but the more I hear about her, the more she seems like an opportunist. She does the things she does and says what she says because she wants to climb the chain, not because she has a good message. Like someone who pours herself into a mold.

Someone who wants a Miata but doesn’t want to drive stick? Not really getting your confusion.

Miata = cute, fun cheap car. The fact that it’s a lightweight sports car is secondary to most people who buy them.

I guess this is everyone’s periodic reminder that, to quote Jezebel editorial staff, “[Jezebel’s] readers don’t have to and shouldn’t take our word on something just because we publish it, especially without hard proof.”

but then we wouldnt get this WOKE AF BLOGPOST! If only Amy could research her subjects as well as she could write reactionary think pieces about perceived racial slights!

First of all, the screenplay was adapted while only the first book existed and the other two were not yet written (Source, about halfway down).

Pebbles will live on forever...

Does it come with a sweet Mr. Plow jacket?

In any other context, I’d side with the kids. But Princeton is supposed to be where the social and intellectual elite is educated and prepared for the burden of leading the world and this was literally a class about hate speech. If this isn’t the class to discuss challenging and controversial issues, uh, what is?

Been to both, live in neither, and...you could not be more wrong, on all accounts. Indy makes the people on the space-cruise ship in Wall-E look like physical specimens...

Totally shitty move by McDaniels, but this illustrates why teams should not be allowed to interview for coaches until after the Super Bowl.

I agree that emotional arguments do have their place in this debate. But I disagree with the notion that an emotional argument is the only argument that should play a role in this. Because thats how it gets presented by these people. You disagree with me, then you don’t care about the experience of sexual assault

I agree that the goal of an ambitious artist is to gain attention, but with most things there’s a right and a wrong way to do it. Her reasoning that he did cubism in order to “chop women’s outlines up and rearrange them in a more pleasing order” at best falls flat and at worst makes her sound ignorant about a

“I resign as HC of IC”

Agreed. Hindsight is 20/20, and most acclaimed artists are somewhat “problematic”. Ms. Sulkowicz herself is a bit “problematic”.

Apparently you have to put in 20 years at Walmart.

Forget helicopter parenting. Thanks to her background, she would know exactly what is manipulation, how to spot it and how to use it. With this knowledge, her “pieces” make so much more sense. They aren’t performance pieces as much as manipulation pieces. Such as going after Picasso knowing full well that the press