No - its her doppleganger.

It actually works faster than putting it in paint and inverting/reverting the images. But I like that you don't have time for that but still have time to comment on Gizmodo. ;)

It's because of god. Don't taint this sweet little miracle with your science! :)

Put your glasses on.

You're broken. Take yourself back to the dealer to see if you're covered by the warranty.

I'll give you that one - only because this story is based in England and they use the word colour instead of color. In the US, analyze is correct.

Are you deep frying your spiders?

How do you know? Maybe you're living in the afterlife (you could be headed for some serious strife... Now you make the scene all day, But tomorrow there'll be Hell to pay)

There are plenty fo news and science sources that will let you know how wrong you are about bottled water - and by the way, you'er already paying for your tap water to be just as clean. So unless you have your own well that might be contaminated, you should probably just drink it from the tap. Maybe use a local tap…

But none from the air, as the hypothesis stated, since, presumably the syringe is fully closed and free of air, allowing you to draw a vacuum to suck the blood out.

The 5 richest kings in europe really don't have that much money anymore...

I'd like to see what policy and practices were changed within Google as a result of this, beyond just paying the fine.

And more and more enforcement like this will increase their risk of those actions and deter them...

Yet at the same time we shouldn't all have healthcare? hmmm

And even if they are put to death, the likelihood of casualties and wounded associated with killing the bad guy doesn't exist as it does with drone strikes.

I can still get the internet in prison. ;)

That dude draws well. And really fast!

You get more rad exposure on the flight than at the scanner

And I'll always fight for a "balanced" approach - because for every one of you that doesn't want this being used there are people like another commentor here that said "I wish they'd all have this and that it could blow up a perpetrator before they commit the crime" (or something to that effect - it's in this comment…

I appreciate and understand your argument and have struggled with it myself. But all things come in balance and I'm not advocating a "wait and see" mentality. I'm resolved to the fact that this technology WILL exist - hell we'll probably all have it in our phones in a decade. You can't stop technological advances…