1234tellmethatyoulovememore
1234tellmethatyoulovememore
1234tellmethatyoulovememore

Every time I read something about The Rock, I think, "Damn...what a positive Bro-Model for all the douche-bros out there."

I think they must've gotten better at some point because I remember not liking them either. I actually don't even know why I ever even tried them again but yeah, it works out I guess.

A Nordstrom Rack is a chimera. It's a Nordstrom store with stuff that didn't sell from the regular Nordstrom, I think. Sometimes it is heaven and filled with the best dansko shoes and cotton shirts in exactly my size. Other times it is hell and filled only with blue sequined flip flops and strange nylon shirts shot

What is frustrating to me about this whole debacle is that, once again, a woman's issue is being reframed as a talk about men. Just paragraphs and paragraphs about men and who is harassing and their race and just every possible permutation of that and racism against men of color and white male privilege etc, etc.

As a queer woman of colour the street harassment that I find myself on the receiving end of varies by demographic and frankly, for me, the most terrifying kind is the silent and hostile kind practiced by white men.

The scariest part about this (in addition to the fact that it's horrifying) is how casually it was said. Like, this guy definitely uses the N word regularly in his daily life because that kind of term doesn't just "slip out" unless it features regularly in your speech.

Navel lint.

Of course Alaska is a better place to visit than Florida. It's fucking beautiful and clean here, and the people are helpful, friendly and honest. And everyone here smokes weed anyway, now it will be legal.

Yeah, the religious reporting (and commenting) on Jezebel is so bad. I have no problem with people disagreeing with religious beliefs (I am not actually religious myself), but for goodness' sake, know what you're disagreeing with! It is simply not helpful to rail against a thing you thought you heard Catholics did,

You have to remember it's the tale wagging the dog with Starbucks, the reason why their dress code looks like it is straight out of the 1950s is because they have to appease the more culturally conservative parts of the country like the south and midwest. Judging by the local coffee shops in Seattle like Slate,

Since we're in a safe space here, I want to get something off my chest. When I was younger, I gave a lot of front hugs. I gave so many hugs to so many people I lost count long ago. Thousands, maybe even tens of thousands. I would front hug anyone: men; women; young people; old people; people I'd known my whole life;

babies and young children who rely on physical affection and closeness to help soothe and emotionally regulate are teeny tiny adorable whores.

the church is actually against invasive infertility assistance. The ruling was called in dignitas personas( I think), and pills are ok, or corrective surgery but it has to be P in V. It's one of the reasons we converted. And makes literally no sense since Mary was the first surrogate mother.

Actually, the Church doesn't require or advocate for life support. It depends on the circumstances and types of support. The Church considers it the choice of the individual whether or not to prolong one's life via medical intervention.

Oh I was joking. I've been on trains with much more famous people, it was more just me making fun of the M train (I have very strong opinions about train lines).

Normal people don't take the M, duh.

The items I've seen were completely appropriate. I think this is all about her not liking the Kardashian's.

Personally my objection is that they're tacky as shit.

What's inappropriate about a leopard print set of leggings for a baby though? Are animal prints inherently sexual? I don't think so, personally.

To be fair to that mom, the fact that one of the pieces of kids' clothing was a "Hampton Blouse," complete with cum stains down the front, struck me as inappropriate for a toddler too.