The craziest thing I notice is that by the time the shadow appears on the wall behind the target object, the front of the object is no longer lit. Wild.

He's spinning in his grave. We just don't know in which direction.

False positives as a result of test accuracy aren't a function of "error by the instrument or user".

The accuracy is a limitation of the test itself. If it generates a false positive on an individual sample, it's always going to generate a false positive on that same sample (and in this case the samples are the same).

Trekker was adopted as a more acceptable descriptor vs. the derogatory Trekkie a very long time ago.

You are correct that using a more accurate test will yield better than 50/50 TP/FP results, but even in your example, it's only an 84% chance that the guy is actually using. Careers shouldn't hinge on that kind of accuracy.

Use these numbers:

You are correct. In my example, the generally accepted actual drug use statistic amongst the general population is 5%.

What is the accuracy of the testosterone test? 95%? 98%? A real false positive would show high testosterone when there actually wasn't, and would do so as a result of the limitations of the test. Unless it's a 100% accurate test, false positives will occur (and they would occur on both samples tested).

So, not only does this McClintock dude have insane pogo chops, but he's got editing chops, too. Well played, sir.

An EA-6B is capable of disrupting anything electronic on the scale of a small town. It's not just anti-radar. We've used them on drug interdictions to remotely stop the engines of drug runner aircraft. Anything electrical within a certain radius can be shut down by an EA-6B.

They have had a policy of blocking certain content from streaming outside the UK because the BBC is paid for by the British government.

Have you ever tried to watch BBC content from outside the UK? You can't. Because they block it.

The Baron approves of this product and looks forward to future refinements.

Uh, which rabbit are we talking about here?

The first rule of jury duty...

Generally, if you're guilty you want a jury trial. If you're innocent, take the judge.

Then again, it may be in the source from the original movie. I just realized that scene is Vader looking at a screen while talking to his captain/admiral remotely, so that may be just the video effect put into the original film.

I can clearly see a moire grid pattern in the pic at the top of this article.

Would somebody please do something about the moire pattern in that picture? Every time I see it, it drives me insane.