kill yourself

Natasha Vargas-Cooper? Is this the same person who asked whether someone who had sex with a person who couldn’t possibly communicate consent was *really* a rapist?  Shocking they would have a terrible take on plenty of issues.

Looks like someone got bored over at the FOX News comment section. 

it’s also important to remember that harry potter was never good

Yes, because ignoring things definitely makes them go away. Like how we ignored Osama bin Laden after the embassy bombings and he was never heard from again.

Is it any shock anymore that she’s one of those people who claim to defend women and their rights yet all they do is attack other women and reduce women to simply a reproductive function?

That sucking sound you hear is what remains of her cultural currency swirling down the loo...

“If wizards shitting on the floor isn’t real, there’s no wizard-shit-disappearing spell. If wizards disappearing shit isn’t real, the lived reality of magic globally is erased. I know and love wizards who shit in toilets, but erasing the concept of floor-shitting-wizard magic removes the ability of many to…

In addition to the transphobia, you’d think a 54 year old would be acutely aware that not all cis-women menstruate. 

I was annoyed when she was constantly retconning the books on Twitter (“oh, Dumbledore is gay now, sorry I forgot to mention that when it might have affected the book sales and box office receipts!”) but this is just weird. She keeps talking about it publicly for no reason and it only goes badly. She has billionaire…

So there is something such as the wrong book to you then? 🤣 You walked straight into that one I’m afraid. Your world view is so narrow it’s no wonder you can’t even see yourself undermining your own point. Say someone wanted context or was researching it?

Jeez, I would hate to be a kid in your library that chooses the “wrong” book (wrong in your opinion)

It's weird you keep bringing up hereditary considering that's not a kids cartoon and therefore not at all relevant

ugh. I hate this logic. OH NO! kids cartoons when i was a kid are too violent for my kids! It’ll make them awful people! Wait... whut? If that’s the case, then you are an awful people too right? If not... Then the argument has zero bearing on reality. The one thing i hated to see the most, was when I tried watching a…

In picture book form? Compared to not mentioning at all until kids are older? Absolutely. To the point where the struggle to publish these books and reduce their frequent bannings has its own fascinating history: check out the fallout of The Rabbits’ Wedding and And Tango Makes Three.

I also love adult cartoons such as Over the Garden Wall, among others that you mentioned. I’d argue that these aren’t really for kids, that they are absolutely made for adults, though kids can still watch and enjoy them.

I mean, it’s still done like any other anime, including colored digitally. It just has filters put over it to make it look old. 

It actually happens somewhat frequently, we just rarely see it over here in the US.

Children’s librarian here: couldn’t be further from the truth, kid’s media these days is edgier than it’s ever been. We’ve got picture books teaching kids about racism and queer rights, we’ve got cartoons like Gravity Falls and Adventure Time merrily creating new nightmares for young viewers, kids have access to the…

Given that we live in a world where we have a new Looney Tunes cartoon that is very much the same as oldschool Looney Tunes, I’d say we do live in a world where it would fly. You’re reading way too much into things.