xanthamgum
XanthamGum
xanthamgum

I mean, yeah, she did a thing and that thing is a crime, but hopefully the DA decides to not pursue the charges.

She broke his shit, but I bet it wasn’t $1500 dollars worth of shit.

You can rightly complain that because of racism the white woman can get off, but please don’t act like smashing his window after the fact is anything but retaliation which IS illegal. I feel for her as I’dve done the same damn thing, but it’s not self defense.

Sixty dollars for a haircut? Different worlds.

But can we be honest and realistic here? Why did she have to do that, after the guy had been arrested? The altercation had concluded, the police arrested the right person. No need to break the window on the dipshit’s truck.

That’s low for a truck windshield.

This story highlights the fact that when you get involved in a street fight, you will also have to answer for your own actions clearly not related to self-defense.

That’s pretty mature.

Not trying to exterminate one side with 4 wars in less than a century would be a great start.

Because chin ups and push ups require a trainer. It’s all about attitude. And yours sucks.

You don’t need to be mega rich to work out though, I’m managing a full time job and triathlon training.

Usually is the muslims coming together to kill the Jewish folks.

I’m glad I’m not the only one that thought this.  This article is either intentionally misleading, or at the very least, very confusing.

But did he attempt the Wade Boggs record? I would have.

More like a person with legs telling a person without legs that they should not take the stairs.

This kinda sounds like the whole participation trophey arguement.

I would just say that From Software games aren’t for you, if that’s chief concern. I get that there is people that want to experience them, but not the difficulty. But there is a million games out there that are easy, and hold your hand, and beat you over the head with all the info they have. That’s most of what

It seems this study is more about an “earnings gap” rather than a “wage gap”. If a person stays at home to raise kids, obviously they’re not making money via employment. They’re earning less money but for a quantifiable reason that has nothing to do with the big scary patriarchy suppressing their wages. This study

Hey, let me be the first to wonder aloud why Splinter, an ostensibly left wing site, is running a pro-Guaidó puff piece written by a journalist from its corporate owner. Seems, uh, pretty weird you guys.

This isn’t true and has been proven many times. The pay gap is about 95% which can easily be explained by factors like women working less, women are less likely to demand raises, women taking time off to raise children, etc.